aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
index 0b418a5b243c..81e828c8313b 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
@@ -128,10 +128,16 @@ Follow these rules to keep your RCU code working properly:
This sort of comparison occurs frequently when scanning
RCU-protected circular linked lists.
- Note that if checks for being within an RCU read-side
- critical section are not required and the pointer is never
- dereferenced, rcu_access_pointer() should be used in place
- of rcu_dereference().
+ Note that if the pointer comparison is done outside
+ of an RCU read-side critical section, and the pointer
+ is never dereferenced, rcu_access_pointer() should be
+ used in place of rcu_dereference(). In most cases,
+ it is best to avoid accidental dereferences by testing
+ the rcu_access_pointer() return value directly, without
+ assigning it to a variable.
+
+ Within an RCU read-side critical section, there is little
+ reason to use rcu_access_pointer().
- The comparison is against a pointer that references memory
that was initialized "a long time ago." The reason