aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c27
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c
index 7f858344b920..c055a153f7df 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-4965-calib.c
@@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ static int il4965_sens_energy_cck(struct il_priv *il,
data->num_in_cck_no_fa);
/* If we got too many false alarms this time, reduce sensitivity */
- if ((false_alarms > max_false_alarms) &&
- (data->auto_corr_cck > AUTO_CORR_MAX_TH_CCK)) {
+ if (false_alarms > max_false_alarms &&
+ data->auto_corr_cck > AUTO_CORR_MAX_TH_CCK) {
D_CALIB("norm FA %u > max FA %u\n",
false_alarms, max_false_alarms);
D_CALIB("... reducing sensitivity\n");
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ static int il4965_sens_energy_cck(struct il_priv *il,
* from a previous beacon with too many, or healthy # FAs
* OR 2) We've seen a lot of beacons (100) with too few
* false alarms */
- if ((data->nrg_prev_state != IL_FA_TOO_MANY) &&
- ((data->nrg_auto_corr_silence_diff > NRG_DIFF) ||
- (data->num_in_cck_no_fa > MAX_NUMBER_CCK_NO_FA))) {
+ if (data->nrg_prev_state != IL_FA_TOO_MANY &&
+ (data->nrg_auto_corr_silence_diff > NRG_DIFF ||
+ data->num_in_cck_no_fa > MAX_NUMBER_CCK_NO_FA)) {
D_CALIB("... increasing sensitivity\n");
/* Increase nrg value to increase sensitivity */
@@ -289,9 +289,9 @@ static int il4965_sens_energy_cck(struct il_priv *il,
val = data->auto_corr_cck_mrc + AUTO_CORR_STEP_CCK;
data->auto_corr_cck_mrc =
min((u32)ranges->auto_corr_max_cck_mrc, val);
- } else if ((false_alarms < min_false_alarms) &&
- ((data->nrg_auto_corr_silence_diff > NRG_DIFF) ||
- (data->num_in_cck_no_fa > MAX_NUMBER_CCK_NO_FA))) {
+ } else if (false_alarms < min_false_alarms &&
+ (data->nrg_auto_corr_silence_diff > NRG_DIFF ||
+ data->num_in_cck_no_fa > MAX_NUMBER_CCK_NO_FA)) {
/* Decrease auto_corr values to increase sensitivity */
val = data->auto_corr_cck - AUTO_CORR_STEP_CCK;
@@ -747,9 +747,8 @@ static void il4965_gain_computation(struct il_priv *il,
for (i = default_chain; i < NUM_RX_CHAINS; i++) {
s32 delta_g = 0;
- if (!(data->disconn_array[i]) &&
- (data->delta_gain_code[i] ==
- CHAIN_NOISE_DELTA_GAIN_INIT_VAL)) {
+ if (!data->disconn_array[i] &&
+ data->delta_gain_code[i] == CHAIN_NOISE_DELTA_GAIN_INIT_VAL) {
delta_g = average_noise[i] - min_average_noise;
data->delta_gain_code[i] = (u8)((delta_g * 10) / 15);
data->delta_gain_code[i] =
@@ -860,7 +859,7 @@ void il4965_chain_noise_calibration(struct il_priv *il, void *stat_resp)
/* Make sure we accumulate data for just the associated channel
* (even if scanning). */
- if ((rxon_chnum != stat_chnum) || (rxon_band24 != stat_band24)) {
+ if (rxon_chnum != stat_chnum || rxon_band24 != stat_band24) {
D_CALIB("Stats not from chan=%d, band24=%d\n",
rxon_chnum, rxon_band24);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&il->lock, flags);
@@ -920,8 +919,8 @@ void il4965_chain_noise_calibration(struct il_priv *il, void *stat_resp)
il->cfg->base_params->chain_noise_num_beacons;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_RX_CHAINS; i++) {
- if (!(data->disconn_array[i]) &&
- (average_noise[i] <= min_average_noise)) {
+ if (!data->disconn_array[i] &&
+ average_noise[i] <= min_average_noise) {
/* This means that chain i is active and has
* lower noise values so far: */
min_average_noise = average_noise[i];