| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit 2ac29a1 (ARM: PMU: fix runtime PM enable) moved the call to
pm_runtime_enable() from the OMAP2+ PMU code into the ARM PERF core
code. However, header for pm_runtime which should have been removed
from the OMAP2+ PMU code was not. It is no longer necessary to include
this header in the OMAP2+ PMU code and so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Pull ARM SoC Header cleanups from Olof Johansson:
"This is a collection of header file cleanups, mostly for OMAP and
AT91, that keeps moving the platforms in the direction of
multiplatform by removing the need for mach-dependent header files
used in drivers and other places."
Fix up mostly trivial conflicts as per Olof.
* tag 'headers' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc: (106 commits)
ARM: OMAP2+: Move iommu/iovmm headers to platform_data
ARM: OMAP2+: Make some definitions local
ARM: OMAP2+: Move iommu2 to drivers/iommu/omap-iommu2.c
ARM: OMAP2+: Move plat/iovmm.h to include/linux/omap-iommu.h
ARM: OMAP2+: Move iopgtable header to drivers/iommu/
ARM: OMAP: Merge iommu2.h into iommu.h
atmel: move ATMEL_MAX_UART to platform_data/atmel.h
ARM: OMAP: Remove omap_init_consistent_dma_size()
arm: at91: move at91rm9200 rtc header in drivers/rtc
arm: at91: move reset controller header to arm/arm/mach-at91
arm: at91: move pit define to the driver
arm: at91: move at91_shdwc.h to arch/arm/mach-at91
arm: at91: move board header to arch/arm/mach-at91
arn: at91: move at91_tc.h to arch/arm/mach-at91
arm: at91 move at91_aic.h to arch/arm/mach-at91
arm: at91 move board.h to arch/arm/mach-at91
arm: at91: move platfarm_data to include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
arm: at91: drop machine defconfig
ARM: OMAP: Remove NEED_MACH_GPIO_H
ARM: OMAP: Remove unnecessary mach and plat includes
...
|
|
Commit 7be2958 (ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support) updated the ARM PMU code to
use runtime PM which was prototyped and validated on the OMAP devices. In this
commit, there is no call pm_runtime_enable() and for OMAP devices
pm_runtime_enable() is currently being called from the OMAP PMU code when the
PMU device is created. However, there are two problems with this:
1. For any other ARM device wishing to use runtime PM for PMU they will need
to call pm_runtime_enable() for runtime PM to work.
2. When booting with device-tree and using device-tree to create the PMU
device, pm_runtime_enable() needs to be called from within the ARM PERF
driver as we are no longer calling any device specific code to create the
device. Hence, PMU does not work on OMAP devices that use the runtime PM
callbacks when using device-tree to create the PMU device.
Therefore, call pm_runtime_enable() directly from the ARM PMU driver when
registering the device. For platforms that do not use runtime PM,
pm_runtime_enable() does nothing and for platforms that do use runtime PM but
may not require it specifically for PMU, this will just add a little overhead
when initialising and uninitialising the PMU device.
Tested with PERF on OMAP2420, OMAP3430 and OMAP4460.
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We want to remove plat/cpu.h. To do this, let's first split
it to private soc.h to mach-omap1 and mach-omap2. We have to
keep plat/cpu.h around until the remaining drivers are fixed,
so let's include the local soc.h in plat/cpu.h and for drivers
still including plat/cpu.h.
Once the drivers are fixed not to include plat/cpu.h, we
can remove the file.
This is needed for the ARM common zImage support.
[tony@atomide.com: updated to not print a warning]
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Let's make omap_hwmod local to mach-omap2 for
ARM common zImage support.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Let's make omap_device local to mach-omap2 for
ARM common zImage support.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
OMAP4460 and OMAP4470 devices have dedicated PMU interrupts and so add these
interrupts to the MPU HWMOD so we can use these for PMU events on these
devices. The PMU interrupts need to be the first interrupts in the array of
interrupts as the ARM PMU driver assumes this.
By using these dedicated interrupts we only need to enable the MPU and DEBUG
sub-systems for PMU to work. This is different to OMAP4430 that did not have
dedicated interrupts and required other power domains in addition to the DEBUG
sub-system to be enabled so we could route the PMU events to the CTI interrupts.
Hence, OMAP4460 and OMAP4470 devices can use the same list of HWMODs to create
the PMU device that is using by OMAP3.
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: updated to apply]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
The original implementation of this patch was done by Ming Lei for PMU on OMAP4
[1]. Since then the PM runtime calls have been moved into the ARM PMU code and
this greatly simplifies the changes.
The another differnce since the original version, is that it is no longer
necessary to call pm_runtime_get/put during the PMU initialisation was we are no
longer accessing the hardware at this stage.
By adding runtime PM support, we can ensure that the appropriate power and clock
domains are kept on while PMU is being used.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074153.html
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
For OMAP4430 PMU events are routed to the CPU via the cross trigger interface
(CTI) because there are no dedicated interrupts. In order to route the PMU
events via the CTI IRQs, the following modules must be enabled:
l3_instr, l3_main_3, debugss
Therefore, build the arm-pmu device via these three HWMODs.
However, the CTI support for this platform still needs some work. Until
that's finished, temporarily disable the PMU on OMAP4430.
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: temporarily disabled OMAP4430 PMU support until a
better CTI interface can be implemented; added patch description note]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
Convert OMAP2/3 devices to use HWMOD for creating a PMU device. To support PMU
on OMAP2 devices we only need to use MPU sub-system and so we can simply use
the MPU HWMOD to create the PMU device. To support PMU on OMAP3 devices, we need
to use the MPU and DEBUG sub-systems and so use these HWMODs to create the PMU
device for OMAP3.
The MPU HWMOD for OMAP2/3 devices is currently missing the PMU interrupt and so
add the PMU interrupt to the MPU HWMOD for these devices.
This change also moves the PMU code out of the mach-omap2/devices.c files into
its own pmu.c file as suggested by Kevin Hilman to de-clutter devices.c.
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: fixed checkpatch messages; updated to apply; dropped old-style
initial filename line in header comments]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
