aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-03-25ARM: 9069/1: NOMMU: Fix conversion for_each_membock() to for_each_mem_range()Vladimir Murzin
for_each_mem_range() uses a loop variable, yet looking into code it is not just iteration counter but more complex entity which encodes information about memblock. Thus condition i == 0 looks fragile. Indeed, it broke boot of R-class platforms since it never took i == 0 path (due to i was set to 1). Fix that with restoring original flag check. Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2020-10-13arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()Mike Rapoport
There are several occurrences of the following pattern: for_each_memblock(memory, reg) { start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg); end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg)); /* do something with start and end */ } Using for_each_mem_range() iterator is more appropriate in such cases and allows simpler and cleaner code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c build] [rppt@linux.ibm.com: mips: fix cavium-octeon build caused by memblock refactoring] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827124549.GD167163@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-13-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01ARM: 8831/1: NOMMU: pmsa-v8: remove unneeded semicolonPeng Hao
Remove unneeded semicolon. [vladimir] proper tags in subject line Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@zte.com.cn> Acked-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-05-19ARM: 8757/1: NOMMU: Support PMSAv8 MPUVladimir Murzin
ARMv8R/M architecture defines new memory protection scheme - PMSAv8 which is not compatible with PMSAv7. Key differences to PMSAv7 are: - Region geometry is defined by base and limit addresses - Addresses need to be either 32 or 64 byte aligned - No region priority due to overlapping regions are not allowed - It is unified, i.e. no distinction between data/instruction regions - Memory attributes are controlled via MAIR This patch implements support for PMSAv8 MPU defined by ARMv8R/M architecture. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>