aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-09-24ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regionsJeremy Linton
PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Finally, add a module parameter which can override the PCC region detection at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-08-25ACPI: CPPC: Add ACPI disabled check to acpi_cpc_valid()Perry Yuan
Make acpi_cpc_valid() check if ACPI is disabled, so that its callers don't need to check that separately. This will also cause the AMD pstate driver to refuse to load right away when ACPI is disabled. Also update the warning message in amd_pstate_init() to mention the ACPI disabled case for completeness. Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject edits, new changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-26ACPI: CPPC: Do not prevent CPPC from working in the futureRafael J. Wysocki
There is a problem with the current revision checks in is_cppc_supported() that they essentially prevent the CPPC support from working if a new _CPC package format revision being a proper superset of the v3 and only causing _CPC to return a package with more entries (while retaining the types and meaning of the entries defined by the v3) is introduced in the future and used by the platform firmware. In that case, as long as the number of entries in the _CPC return package is at least CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT, it should be perfectly fine to use the v3 support code and disregard the additional package entries added by the new package format revision. For this reason, drop is_cppc_supported() altogether, put the revision checks directly into acpi_cppc_processor_probe() so they are easier to follow and rework them to take the case mentioned above into account. Fixes: 4773e77cdc9b ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for CPPC v3") Cc: 4.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.18+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-18ACPI: CPPC: Don't require flexible address space if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is ↵Mario Limonciello
supported Commit 0651ab90e4ad ("ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address space") changed _CPC probing to require flexible address space to be negotiated for CPPC to work. However it was observed that this caused a regression for Arek's ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503QM which previously CPPC worked, but now it stopped working. To avoid causing a regression waive this failure when the CPU is known to support CPPC. Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216248 Fixes: 0651ab90e4ad ("ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address space") Reported-and-tested-by: Arek Ruśniak <arek.rusi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is supportedMario Limonciello
commit 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") added support for claiming to support CPPC in _OSC on non-Intel platforms. This unfortunately caused a regression on a vartiety of AMD platforms in the field because a number of AMD platforms don't set the `_OSC` bit 5 or 6 to indicate CPPC or CPPC v2 support. As these AMD platforms already claim CPPC support via a dedicated MSR from `X86_FEATURE_CPPC`, use this enable this feature rather than requiring the `_OSC` on platforms with a dedicated MSR. If there is additional breakage on the shared memory designs also missing this _OSC, additional follow up changes may be needed. Fixes: 72f2ecb7ece7 ("Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") Reported-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: CPPC: Only probe for _CPC if CPPC v2 is ackedMario Limonciello
Previously the kernel used to ignore whether the firmware masked CPPC or CPPCv2 and would just pretend that it worked. When support for the USB4 bit in _OSC was introduced from commit 9e1f561afb ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear") the kernel began to look at the return when the query bit was clear. This caused regressions that were misdiagnosed and attempted to be solved as part of commit 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag""). This caused a different regression where non-Intel systems weren't able to negotiate _OSC properly. This was reverted in commit 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag"") and attempted to be fixed by commit c42fa24b4475 ("ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmware") but the regression still returned. These systems with the regression only load support for CPPC from an SSDT dynamically when _OSC reports CPPC v2. Avoid the problem by not letting CPPC satisfy the requirement in `acpi_cppc_processor_probe`. Reported-by: CUI Hao <cuihao.leo@gmail.com> Reported-by: maxim.novozhilov@gmail.com Reported-by: lethe.tree@protonmail.com Reported-by: garystephenwright@gmail.com Reported-by: galaxyking0419@gmail.com Fixes: c42fa24b4475 ("ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmware") Fixes: 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag"") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075387 Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: CUI Hao <cuihao.leo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-30Merge branches 'acpi-glue', 'acpi-osl', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-cppc'Rafael J. Wysocki
Merge general ACPI cleanups and processor support updates for 5.19-rc1: - Rearrange find_child_checks() to simplify code (Rafael Wysocki). - Use memremap() to map the UCSI mailbox that is always in main memory and drop acpi_release_memory() that has no more users (Heikki Krogerus, Dan Carpenter). - Make max_cstate/nocst/bm_check_disable processor module parameters visible in sysfs (Yajun Deng). - Fix typo in the CPPC driver (Julia Lawall). * acpi-glue: ACPI: glue: Rearrange find_child_checks() * acpi-osl: usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check in probe ACPI: OSL: Remove the helper for deactivating memory region usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Map the mailbox with memremap() * acpi-processor: ACPI: processor: idle: Expose max_cstate/nocst/bm_check_disable read-only in sysfs * acpi-cppc: ACPI: CPPC: fix typo in comment
2022-05-25ACPI: CPPC: fix typo in commentJulia Lawall
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment. Detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19cpufreq: CPPC: Enable fast_switchPierre Gondois
The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware. commit b7898fda5bc7 ("cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching") fast_switching is 'for switching CPU frequencies from interrupt context'. Writes to SystemMemory and SystemIo are fast and suitable this. This is not the case for PCC and might not be the case for FFH. Enable fast_switching for the cppc_cpufreq driver in above cases. Add cppc_allow_fast_switch() to check the desired performance register address space and set fast_switching accordingly. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19ACPI: CPPC: Assume no transition latency if no PCCTPierre Gondois
The transition_delay_us (struct cpufreq_policy) is currently defined as: Preferred average time interval between consecutive invocations of the driver to set the frequency for this policy. To be set by the scaling driver (0, which is the default, means no preference). The transition_latency represents the amount of time necessary for a CPU to change its frequency. A PCCT table advertises mutliple values: - pcc_nominal: Expected latency to process a command, in microseconds - pcc_mpar: The maximum number of periodic requests that the subspace channel can support, reported in commands per minute. 0 indicates no limitation. - pcc_mrtt: The minimum amount of time that OSPM must wait after the completion of a command before issuing the next command, in microseconds. cppc_get_transition_latency() allows to get the max of them. commit d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us") allows to select transition_delay_us based on the platform, and fallbacks to cppc_get_transition_latency() otherwise. If _CPC objects are not using PCC channels (no PPCT table), the transition_delay_us is set to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to really long periods between frequency updates (~4s). If the desired_reg, where performance requests are written, is in SystemMemory or SystemIo ACPI address space, there is no delay in requests. So return 0 instead of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to transition_delay_us being set to LATENCY_MULTIPLIER us (1000 us). This patch also adds two macros to check the address spaces. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address spacePierre Gondois
ACPI 6.2 Section 6.2.11.2 'Platform-Wide OSPM Capabilities': Starting with ACPI Specification 6.2, all _CPC registers can be in PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware address spaces. OSPM support for this more flexible register space scheme is indicated by the “Flexible Address Space for CPPC Registers” _OSC bit Otherwise (cf ACPI 6.1, s8.4.7.1.1.X), _CPC registers must be in: - PCC or Functional Fixed Hardware address space if defined - SystemMemory address space (NULL register) if not defined Add the corresponding _OSC bit and check it when parsing _CPC objects. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-03-25ACPI: CPPC: Change default error code and clean up debug messages in probeRafael J. Wysocki
Change the default error code returned by acpi_cppc_processor_probe() from -EFAULT (which is completely inadequate) to -ENODATA and change the debug messages printed by it to contain more information and be more consistent. While at it, format some white space to follow the coding style. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
2022-03-25ACPI: CPPC: Avoid out of bounds access when parsing _CPC dataRafael J. Wysocki
If the NumEntries field in the _CPC return package is less than 2, do not attempt to access the "Revision" element of that package, because it may not be present then. Fixes: 337aadff8e45 ("ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC") BugLink: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220322143534.GC32582@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
2022-03-18Merge branches 'acpi-ec', 'acpi-cppc', 'acpi-fan' and 'acpi-battery'Rafael J. Wysocki
Merge ACPI EC driver changes, CPPC-related changes, ACPI fan driver changes and ACPI battery driver changes for 5.18-rc1: - Make wakeup events checks in the ACPI EC driver more straightforward and clean up acpi_ec_submit_event() (Rafael Wysocki). - Make it possible to obtain the CPU capacity with the help of CPPC information (Ionela Voinescu). - Improve fine grained fan control in the ACPI fan driver and document it (Srinivas Pandruvada). - Add device HID and quirk for Microsoft Surface Go 3 to the ACPI battery driver (Maximilian Luz). * acpi-ec: ACPI: EC: Rearrange code in acpi_ec_submit_event() ACPI: EC: Reduce indentation level in acpi_ec_submit_event() ACPI: EC: Do not return result from advance_transaction() * acpi-cppc: arm64, topology: enable use of init_cpu_capacity_cppc() arch_topology: obtain cpu capacity using information from CPPC x86, ACPI: rename init_freq_invariance_cppc() to arch_init_invariance_cppc() * acpi-fan: Documentation/admin-guide/acpi: Add documentation for fine grain control ACPI: fan: Add additional attributes for fine grain control ACPI: fan: Properly handle fine grain control ACPI: fan: Optimize struct acpi_fan_fif ACPI: fan: Separate file for attributes creation ACPI: fan: Fix error reporting to user space * acpi-battery: ACPI: battery: Add device HID and quirk for Microsoft Surface Go 3
2022-03-17ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmwareRafael J. Wysocki
If the platform firmware indicates that it does not support CPPC by clearing the OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT and OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT bits in the platform _OSC capabilities mask, avoid attempting to evaluate _CPC which may fail in that case. Because the OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT and OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT bits are only added to the supported platform capabilities mask on x86, when X86_FEATURE_HWP is supported, allow _CPC to be evaluated regardless in the other cases. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0i=ecAksq0TV+iLVObm-=fUfdqPABzzkgm9K6KxO1ZCcg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2022-03-10x86, ACPI: rename init_freq_invariance_cppc() to arch_init_invariance_cppc()Ionela Voinescu
init_freq_invariance_cppc() was called in acpi_cppc_processor_probe(), after CPU performance information and controls were populated from the per-cpu _CPC objects. But these _CPC objects provide information that helps with both CPU (u-arch) and frequency invariance. Therefore, change the function name to a more generic one, while adding the arch_ prefix, as this function is expected to be defined differently by different architectures. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-01-17ACPI: CPPC: Drop redundant local variable from cpc_read()Rafael J. Wysocki
The ret_val local variable in cpc_read() is not necessary, so eliminate it. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
2022-01-17ACPI: CPPC: Fix up I/O port access in cpc_read()Rafael J. Wysocki
The code as currently implemented does not work on big endian systems, so fix it up. Fixes: a2c8f92bea5f ("ACPI: CPPC: Implement support for SystemIO registers") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20220111092928.GA24968@kili/ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
2022-01-10Merge tag 'pm-5.17-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "The most signigicant change here is the addition of a new cpufreq 'P-state' driver for AMD processors as a better replacement for the venerable acpi-cpufreq driver. There are also other cpufreq updates (in the core, intel_pstate, ARM drivers), PM core updates (mostly related to adding new macros for declaring PM operations which should make the lives of driver developers somewhat easier), and a bunch of assorted fixes and cleanups. Summary: - Add new P-state driver for AMD processors (Huang Rui). - Fix initialization of min and max frequency QoS requests in the cpufreq core (Rafael Wysocki). - Fix EPP handling on Alder Lake in intel_pstate (Srinivas Pandruvada). - Make intel_pstate update cpuinfo.max_freq when notified of HWP capabilities changes and drop a redundant function call from that driver (Rafael Wysocki). - Improve IRQ support in the Qcom cpufreq driver (Ard Biesheuvel, Stephen Boyd, Vladimir Zapolskiy). - Fix double devm_remap() in the Mediatek cpufreq driver (Hector Yuan). - Introduce thermal pressure helpers for cpufreq CPU cooling (Lukasz Luba). - Make cpufreq use default_groups in kobj_type (Greg Kroah-Hartman). - Make cpuidle use default_groups in kobj_type (Greg Kroah-Hartman). - Fix two comments in cpuidle code (Jason Wang, Yang Li). - Allow model-specific normal EPB value to be used in the intel_epb sysfs attribute handling code (Srinivas Pandruvada). - Simplify locking in pm_runtime_put_suppliers() (Rafael Wysocki). - Add safety net to supplier device release in the runtime PM core code (Rafael Wysocki). - Capture device status before disabling runtime PM for it (Rafael Wysocki). - Add new macros for declaring PM operations to allow drivers to avoid guarding them with CONFIG_PM #ifdefs or __maybe_unused and update some drivers to use these macros (Paul Cercueil). - Allow ACPI hardware signature to be honoured during restore from hibernation (David Woodhouse). - Update outdated operating performance points (OPP) documentation (Tang Yizhou). - Reduce log severity for informative message regarding frequency transition failures in devfreq (Tzung-Bi Shih). - Add DRAM frequency controller devfreq driver for Allwinner sunXi SoCs (Samuel Holland). - Add missing COMMON_CLK dependency to sun8i devfreq driver (Arnd Bergmann). - Add support for new layout of Psys PowerLimit Register on SPR to the Intel RAPL power capping driver (Zhang Rui). - Fix typo in a comment in idle_inject.c (Jason Wang). - Remove unused function definition from the DTPM (Dynamit Thermal Power Management) power capping framework (Daniel Lezcano). - Reduce DTPM trace verbosity (Daniel Lezcano)" * tag 'pm-5.17-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (53 commits) x86, sched: Fix undefined reference to init_freq_invariance_cppc() build error cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix Kconfig dependencies for AMD P-State cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix struct amd_cpudata kernel-doc comment cpuidle: use default_groups in kobj_type x86: intel_epb: Allow model specific normal EPB value MAINTAINERS: Add AMD P-State driver maintainer entry Documentation: amd-pstate: Add AMD P-State driver introduction cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add AMD P-State performance attributes cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add AMD P-State frequencies attributes cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add boost mode support for AMD P-State cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add trace for AMD P-State module cpufreq: amd-pstate: Introduce the support for the processors with shared memory solution cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State cpufreq: amd-pstate: Introduce a new AMD P-State driver to support future processors ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC enable register function ACPI: CPPC: Check present CPUs for determining _CPC is valid ACPI: CPPC: Implement support for SystemIO registers x86/msr: Add AMD CPPC MSR definitions x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD Collaborative Processor Performance Control feature flag cpufreq: use default_groups in kobj_type ...
2022-01-10Merge branches 'acpi-tables', 'acpi-numa', 'acpi-sysfs', 'acpi-cppc', ↵Rafael J. Wysocki
'acpi-thermal' and 'acpi-battery' Merge ACPI tables parsing code update, NUMA-related ACPI update, CPPC documentation update, ACPI sysfs attributes handling update and ACPI thermal and battery drivers updates for 5.17-rc1: - Add AEST to the list of known ACPI table signatures (Shuuichirou Ishii). - Make ACPI NUMA code take hotpluggable memblocks into account when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is not set (Vitaly Kuznetsov). - Use default_groups in kobj_type in the ACPI sysfs code (Greg Kroah-Hartman). - Rearrange _CPC structure documentation (Andy Shevchenko). - Drop an always true check from the ACPI thermal driver (Adam Borowski). - Add new "not charging" quirk for Lenovo ThinkPads to the ACPI battery driver (Thomas Weißschuh). * acpi-tables: ACPI: tables: Add AEST to the list of known table signatures * acpi-numa: ACPI: NUMA: Process hotpluggable memblocks when !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG * acpi-sysfs: ACPI: sysfs: use default_groups in kobj_type * acpi-cppc: ACPI: CPPC: Amend documentation in the comments * acpi-thermal: ACPI: thermal: drop an always true check * acpi-battery: ACPI: battery: Add the ThinkPad "Not Charging" quirk
2021-12-30ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC enable register functionJinzhou Su
Add a new function to enable CPPC feature. This function will write Continuous Performance Control package EnableRegister field on the processor. CPPC EnableRegister register described in section 8.4.7.1 of ACPI 6.4: This element is optional. If supported, contains a resource descriptor with a single Register() descriptor that describes a register to which OSPM writes a One to enable CPPC on this processor. Before this register is set, the processor will be controlled by legacy mechanisms (ACPI Pstates, firmware, etc.). This register will be used for AMD processors to enable AMD P-State function instead of legacy ACPI P-States. Signed-off-by: Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-30ACPI: CPPC: Check present CPUs for determining _CPC is validMario Limonciello
As this is a static check, it should be based upon what is currently present on the system. This makes probeing more deterministic. While local APIC flags field (lapic_flags) of cpu core in MADT table is 0, then the cpu core won't be enabled. In this case, _CPC won't be found in this core, and return back to _CPC invalid with walking through possible cpus (include disable cpus). This is not expected, so switch to check present CPUs instead. Reported-by: Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-30ACPI: CPPC: Implement support for SystemIO registersSteven Noonan
According to the ACPI v6.2 (and later) specification, SystemIO can be used for _CPC registers. This teaches cppc_acpi how to handle such registers. This patch was tested using the amd_pstate driver on my Zephyrus G15 (model GA503QS) using the current version 410 BIOS, which uses a SystemIO register for the HighestPerformance element in _CPC. Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan <steven@valvesoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-28ACPI: sysfs: use default_groups in kobj_typeGreg Kroah-Hartman
There are currently 2 ways to create a set of sysfs files for a kobj_type, through the default_attrs field, and the default_groups field. Move the ACPI sysfs code to use default_groups field which has been the preferred way since aa30f47cf666 ("kobject: Add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type") so that we can soon get rid of the obsolete default_attrs field. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-22ACPI: CPPC: Amend documentation in the commentsAndy Shevchenko
Currently it's too hard to read the _CPC structure as it's commented. Reshuffle indentation and style to make it readable. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-11-24ACPI: CPPC: Add NULL pointer check to cppc_get_perf()Rafael J. Wysocki
Check cpc_desc against NULL in cppc_get_perf(), so it doesn't crash down the road if cpc_desc is NULL. Fixes: 0654cf05d17b ("ACPI: CPPC: Introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf()") Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 5.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.15+ Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
2021-10-29mailbox: pcc: Use PCC mailbox channel pointer instead of standardSudeep Holla
Now that we have all the shared memory region information populated in the pcc_mbox_chan, let us propagate the pointer to the same as the return value to pcc_mbox_request channel. This eliminates the need for the individual users of PCC mailbox to parse the PCCT subspace entries and fetch the shmem information. This also eliminates the need for PCC mailbox controller to set con_priv to PCCT subspace entries. This is required as con_priv is private to the controller driver to attach private data associated with the channel and not meant to be used by the mailbox client/users. Let us convert all the users of pcc_mbox_{request,free}_channel to use new interface. Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
2021-09-07ACPI: CPPC: Introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf()Rafael J. Wysocki
On some systems the nominal_perf value retrieved via CPPC is just a constant and fetching it doesn't require accessing any registers, so if it is the only CPPC capability that's needed, it is wasteful to run cppc_get_perf_caps() in order to get just that value alone, especially when this is done for CPUs other than the one running the code. For this reason, introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf() allowing nominal_perf to be obtained individually, by generalizing the existing cppc_get_desired_perf() (and renaming it) so it can be used to retrieve any specific CPPC capability value. While at it, clean up the cppc_get_desired_perf() kerneldoc comment a bit. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-26Merge branch 'acpi-misc'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-misc: ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: fix various typos in comments
2021-04-08ACPI: CPPC: Replace cppc_attr with kobj_attributeNathan Chancellor
All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf); because that is the type of the ->show() member in 'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf); because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a Control Flow Integrity violation [1]. $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf 3400 $ dmesg | grep "CFI failure" [ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8): As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr' and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs. size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are read-only. Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix the violation. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/ Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1343 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issuesXiaofei Tan
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including the following types: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline ERROR: spaces required around that '>=' ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-23ACPI: CPPC: Add emtpy stubs of functions for CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB unsetRafael J. Wysocki
For convenience, add empty stubs of library functions defined in cppc_acpi.c for the CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB unset case. Because one of them needs to return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, include linux/cpufreq.h into the CPPC library header file and drop the direct inclusion of it from cppc_acpi.c. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
2021-03-19ACPI: fix various typos in commentsTom Saeger
Fix trivial ACPI driver comment typos. s/notifcations/notifications/ s/Ajust/Adjust/ s/preform/perform/ s/atrributes/attributes/ s/Souce/Source/ s/Evalutes/Evaluates/ s/Evalutes/Evaluates/ s/specifiy/specify/ s/promixity/proximity/ s/presuambly/presumably/ s/Evalute/Evaluate/ s/specificed/specified/ s/rountine/routine/ s/previosuly/previously/ Change comment referencing pcc_send_cmd to send_pcc_cmd. Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-01-22ACPI: CPPC: initialise vaddr pointers to NULLIonela Voinescu
Properly initialise vaddr pointers in cpc_read() and cpc_write() to NULL instead of 0. This fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:937:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:982:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-01-22ACPI: CPPC: add __iomem annotation to generic_comm_base pointerIonela Voinescu
ppc_comm_addr is a virtual address to the PCC space and it's annotated with __iomem. Therefore, generic_comm_base which gets assigned the value of pcc_comm_address should be annotated as well. This already happens in check_pcc_chan(), but not in send_pcc_cmd(), which results in the following sparse warnings: drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:237:18: warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: got unsigned short * drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: got unsigned short * Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-22Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use most recent guaranteed performance values cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback cpufreq: Add special-purpose fast-switching callback for drivers cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting ACPI: processor: fix NONE coordination for domain mapping failure ACPI: processor: Drop duplicate setting of shared_cpu_map
2020-12-15cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a listIonela Voinescu
The cppc_cpudata per-cpu storage was inefficient (1) additional to causing functional issues (2) when CPUs are hotplugged out, due to per-cpu data being improperly initialised. (1) The amount of information needed for CPPC performance control in its cpufreq driver depends on the domain (PSD) coordination type: ANY: One set of CPPC control and capability data (e.g desired performance, highest/lowest performance, etc) applies to all CPUs in the domain. ALL: Same as ANY. To be noted that this type is not currently supported. When supported, information about which CPUs belong to a domain is needed in order for frequency change requests to be sent to each of them. HW: It's necessary to store CPPC control and capability information for all the CPUs. HW will then coordinate the performance state based on their limitations and requests. NONE: Same as HW. No HW coordination is expected. Despite this, the previous initialisation code would indiscriminately allocate memory for all CPUs (all_cpu_data) and unnecessarily duplicate performance capabilities and the domain sharing mask and type for each possible CPU. (2) With the current per-cpu structure, when having ANY coordination, the cppc_cpudata cpu information is not initialised (will remain 0) for all CPUs in a policy, other than policy->cpu. When policy->cpu is hotplugged out, the driver will incorrectly use the uninitialised (0) value of the other CPUs when making frequency changes. Additionally, the previous values stored in the perf_ctrls.desired_perf will be lost when policy->cpu changes. Therefore replace the array of per cpu data with a list. The memory for each structure is allocated at policy init, where a single structure can be allocated per policy, not per cpu. In order to accommodate the struct list_head node in the cppc_cpudata structure, the now unused cpu and cur_policy variables are removed. For example, on a arm64 Juno platform with 6 CPUs: (0, 1, 2, 3) in PSD1, (4, 5) in PSD2 - ANY coordination, the memory allocation comparison shows: Before patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 0 0 0 0/1 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7810 0 0 0 0/6 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7808 128 80 48 1/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc070 768 0 768 6/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc0e4 After patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 256 0 256 2/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed410 0 0 0 0/2 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed274 Additional notes: - A pointer to the policy's cppc_cpudata is stored in policy->driver_data - Driver registration is skipped if _CPC entries are not present. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-15ACPI: processor: fix NONE coordination for domain mapping failureIonela Voinescu
For errors parsing the _PSD domains, a separate domain is returned for each CPU in the failed _PSD domain with no coordination (as per previous comment). But contrary to the intention, the code was setting CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL as coordination type. Change shared_type to CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_NONE in case of errors parsing the domain information. The function still returns the error and the caller is free to bail out the domain initialisation altogether in that case. Given that both functions return domains with a single CPU, this change does not affect the functionality, but clarifies the intention. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject edit ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-11x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systemsNathan Fontenot
This is the first pass in creating the ability to calculate the frequency invariance on AMD systems. This approach uses the CPPC highest performance and nominal performance values that range from 0 - 255 instead of a high and base frquency. This is because we do not have the ability on AMD to get a highest frequency value. On AMD systems the highest performance and nominal performance vaues do correspond to the highest and base frequencies for the system so using them should produce an appropriate ratio but some tweaking is likely necessary. Due to CPPC being initialized later in boot than when the frequency invariant calculation is currently made, I had to create a callback from the CPPC init code to do the calculation after we have CPPC data. Special thanks to "kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>" for reporting that compilation of drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c is conditional to CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB, not just CONFIG_ACPI. [ ggherdovich@suse.cz: made safe under CPU hotplug, edited changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112182614.10700-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz
2020-05-28ACPI: CPPC: Fix reference count leak in acpi_cppc_processor_probe()Qiushi Wu
kobject_init_and_add() takes reference even when it fails. If this function returns an error, kobject_put() must be called to properly clean up the memory associated with the object. Previous commit "b8eb718348b8" fixed a similar problem. Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance") Signed-off-by: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@umn.edu> Cc: 4.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.10+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-04-27ACPI: CPPC: Make some symbols staticZou Wei
Fix the following sparse warnings: drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:353:20: warning: symbol 'cppc_mbox_cl' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:600:5: warning: symbol 'pcc_data_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-03-28ACPI: CPPC: clean up acpi_get_psd_map()Liguang Zhang
In acpi_get_psd_map() variable all_cpu_data[] can't be NULL and variable match_cpc_ptr has been checked before, no need check again at the end of the funchtion. Some additional optimizations can be made on top of that. Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-10-18ACPI: CPPC: Set pcc_data[pcc_ss_id] to NULL in acpi_cppc_processor_exit()John Garry
When enabling KASAN and DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE, I find this KASAN warning: [ 20.872057] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in pcc_data_alloc+0x40/0xb8 [ 20.878226] Read of size 4 at addr ffff00236cdeb684 by task swapper/0/1 [ 20.884826] [ 20.886309] CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc1-00009-ge7f7df3db5bf-dirty #289 [ 20.894994] Hardware name: Huawei D06 /D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI RC0 - V1.16.01 03/15/2019 [ 20.903505] Call trace: [ 20.905942] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x200 [ 20.909593] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 20.912899] dump_stack+0xd4/0x130 [ 20.916291] print_address_description.isra.9+0x6c/0x3b8 [ 20.921592] __kasan_report+0x12c/0x23c [ 20.925417] kasan_report+0xc/0x18 [ 20.928808] __asan_load4+0x94/0xb8 [ 20.932286] pcc_data_alloc+0x40/0xb8 [ 20.935938] acpi_cppc_processor_probe+0x4e8/0xb08 [ 20.940717] __acpi_processor_start+0x48/0xb0 [ 20.945062] acpi_processor_start+0x40/0x60 [ 20.949235] really_probe+0x118/0x548 [ 20.952887] driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x148 [ 20.957059] device_driver_attach+0x94/0xa0 [ 20.961231] __driver_attach+0xa4/0x110 [ 20.965055] bus_for_each_dev+0xe8/0x158 [ 20.968966] driver_attach+0x30/0x40 [ 20.972531] bus_add_driver+0x234/0x2f0 [ 20.976356] driver_register+0xbc/0x1d0 [ 20.980182] acpi_processor_driver_init+0x40/0xe4 [ 20.984875] do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x254 [ 20.988700] kernel_init_freeable+0x24c/0x2f8 [ 20.993047] kernel_init+0x10/0x118 [ 20.996524] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 21.000087] [ 21.001567] Allocated by task 1: [ 21.004785] save_stack+0x28/0xc8 [ 21.008089] __kasan_kmalloc.isra.9+0xbc/0xd8 [ 21.012435] kasan_kmalloc+0xc/0x18 [ 21.015913] pcc_data_alloc+0x94/0xb8 [ 21.019564] acpi_cppc_processor_probe+0x4e8/0xb08 [ 21.024343] __acpi_processor_start+0x48/0xb0 [ 21.028689] acpi_processor_start+0x40/0x60 [ 21.032860] really_probe+0x118/0x548 [ 21.036512] driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x148 [ 21.040684] device_driver_attach+0x94/0xa0 [ 21.044855] __driver_attach+0xa4/0x110 [ 21.048680] bus_for_each_dev+0xe8/0x158 [ 21.052591] driver_attach+0x30/0x40 [ 21.056155] bus_add_driver+0x234/0x2f0 [ 21.059980] driver_register+0xbc/0x1d0 [ 21.063805] acpi_processor_driver_init+0x40/0xe4 [ 21.068497] do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x254 [ 21.072322] kernel_init_freeable+0x24c/0x2f8 [ 21.076667] kernel_init+0x10/0x118 [ 21.080144] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 21.083707] [ 21.085186] Freed by task 1: [ 21.088056] save_stack+0x28/0xc8 [ 21.091360] __kasan_slab_free+0x118/0x180 [ 21.095445] kasan_slab_free+0x10/0x18 [ 21.099183] kfree+0x80/0x268 [ 21.102139] acpi_cppc_processor_exit+0x1a8/0x1b8 [ 21.106832] acpi_processor_stop+0x70/0x80 [ 21.110917] really_probe+0x174/0x548 [ 21.114568] driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x148 [ 21.118740] device_driver_attach+0x94/0xa0 [ 21.122912] __driver_attach+0xa4/0x110 [ 21.126736] bus_for_each_dev+0xe8/0x158 [ 21.130648] driver_attach+0x30/0x40 [ 21.134212] bus_add_driver+0x234/0x2f0 [ 21.0x10/0x18 [ 21.161764] [ 21.163244] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff00236cdeb600 [ 21.163244] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256 [ 21.175750] The buggy address is located 132 bytes inside of [ 21.175750] 256-byte region [ffff00236cdeb600, ffff00236cdeb700) [ 21.187473] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 21.192254] page:fffffe008d937a00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff002370c0fa00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 21.202331] flags: 0x1ffff00000010200(slab|head) [ 21.206940] raw: 1ffff00000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff002370c0fa00 [ 21.214671] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000802a002a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 21.222400] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 21.227959] [ 21.229438] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 21.234218] ffff00236cdeb580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 21.241427] ffff00236cdeb600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 21.248637] >ffff00236cdeb680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 21.255845] ^ [ 21.259062] ffff00236cdeb700: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 21.266272] ffff00236cdeb780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 21.273480] ================================================================== It seems that global pcc_data[pcc_ss_id] can be freed in acpi_cppc_processor_exit(), but we may later reference this value, so NULLify it when freed. Also remove the useless setting of data "pcc_channel_acquired", which we're about to free. Fixes: 85b1407bf6d2 ("ACPI / CPPC: Make CPPC ACPI driver aware of PCC subspace IDs") Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Cc: 4.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.15+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-28ACPI / CPPC: do not require the _PSD methodAl Stone
According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional when using CPPC. The underlying assumption is that each CPU can change frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell the OS that some processors can NOT do that. However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns ENODEV if there is no _PSD method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating _PSD, if present. This makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation of the specification, and only on Linux. This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow the spec. We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though. So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can not be executed properly. This allows _PSD to be optional as it should be. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-06Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-tables', 'acpi-misc' and 'acpi-pm'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-scan: ACPI / scan: Add labels for PNP button devices ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package() * acpi-tables: ACPI / tables: Clean up whitespace * acpi-misc: ACPI / DPTF: Use dev_get_drvdata() ACPI: event: replace strcpy() by strscpy() ACPI: Fix comment typos * acpi-pm: ACPI: PM: Print debug messages when enabling GPEs for wakeup
2019-03-26ACPI: Fix comment typosBjorn Helgaas
Fix some misspellings in comments. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-03-25ACPI / CPPC: Fix guaranteed performance handlingSrinivas Pandruvada
As per the ACPI specification, "Guaranteed Performance Register" is a "Buffer" field and it cannot be "Integer", so treat the "Integer" type for "Guaranteed Performance Register" field as invalid and ignore its value in that case. Also save one cpc_read() call when "Guaranteed Performance Register" is not present, which means a register defined as: "Register(SystemMemory, 0, 0, 0, 0)". Fixes: 29523f095397 ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performance") Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.20+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-18ACPI / CPPC: Add a helper to get desired performanceXiongfeng Wang
This patch add a helper to get the value of desired performance register. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: More white space ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-10-16ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performanceSrinivas Pandruvada
The Continuous Performance Control package may contain an optional guaranteed performance field. Add support to read guaranteed performance from _CPC. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>