aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cxl/pci.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Consolidate CXL DVSEC Range enumeration in the coreDan Williams
In preparation for fixing the setting of the 'mem_enabled' bit in CXL DVSEC Control register, move all CXL DVSEC range enumeration into the same source file. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688886.1426646.15046138604010482084.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Move cxl_await_media_ready() to the coreDan Williams
Allow cxl_await_media_ready() to be mocked for testing purposes rather than carrying the maintenance burden of an indirect function call in the mainline driver. With the move cxl_await_media_ready() can no longer reuse the mailbox timeout override, so add a media_ready_timeout module parameter to the core to backfill. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688340.1426646.4755627801983775011.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Drop wait_for_valid() from cxl_await_media_ready()Dan Williams
A check mem_info_valid already happens in __cxl_dvsec_ranges(). Rely on that instead of calling wait_for_valid again. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291686632.1426646.7479581732894574486.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Consolidate wait_for_media() and wait_for_media_ready()Dan Williams
Now that wait_for_media() does nothing supplemental to wait_for_media_ready() just promote wait_for_media_ready() to a common helper and drop wait_for_media(). Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291686046.1426646.4390664747934592185.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-12cxl/pci: Make cxl_dvsec_ranges() failure not fatal to cxl_pciDan Williams
cxl_dvsec_ranges(), the helper for enumerating the presence of an active legacy CXL.mem configuration on a CXL 2.0 Memory Expander, is not fatal for cxl_pci because there is still value to enable mailbox operations even if CXL.mem operation is disabled. Recall that the reason cxl_pci does this initialization and not cxl_mem is to preserve the useful property (for unit testing) that cxl_mem is cxl_memdev + mmio generic, and does not require access to a 'struct pci_dev' to issue config cycles. Update 'struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info' to carry either a positive number of non-zero size legacy CXL DVSEC ranges, or the negative error code from __cxl_dvsec_ranges() in its @ranges member. Reported-by: Krzysztof Zach <krzysztof.zach@intel.com> Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info") Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730735869.3806189.4032428192652531946.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-12cxl/pci: Add debug for DVSEC range init failuresDan Williams
In preparation for not treating DVSEC range initialization failures as fatal to cxl_pci_probe() add individual dev_dbg() statements for each of the major failure reasons in cxl_dvsec_ranges(). The rationale for cxl_dvsec_ranges() failure not being fatal is that there is still value for cxl_pci to enable mailbox operations even if CXL.mem operation is disabled. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730734812.3806189.2726330688692684104.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-12cxl/mbox: Use new return_code handlingDavidlohr Bueso
Use the global cxl_mbox_cmd_rc table to improve debug messaging in __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd() and allow cxl_mbox_send_cmd() to map to proper kernel style errno codes - this patch continues to use -ENXIO only so no change in semantics. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed by: Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404021216.66841-5-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-12cxl/mbox: Improve handling of mbox_cmd hw return codesDavidlohr Bueso
Upon a completed command the caller is still expected to check the actual return_code register to ensure it succeed. This adds, per the spec, the potential command return codes. It maps the hardware return code with the kernel's errno style, and by default continues to use -ENXIO (Command completed, but device reported an error). Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed by: Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404021216.66841-4-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-12cxl/pci: Use CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS to check against mbox_cmd return codeDavidlohr Bueso
Also mention the need for the caller to check against any errors from the hardware in return_code. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed by: Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404021216.66841-3-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-08cxl/pci: Drop shadowed variableDan Williams
0day reports that wait_for_media_ready() declares an @rc variable twice. >> drivers/cxl/pci.c:439:7: warning: Local variable 'rc' shadows outer variable [shadowVariable] int rc; ^ drivers/cxl/pci.c:431:6: note: Shadowed declaration int rc, i; ^ drivers/cxl/pci.c:439:7: note: Shadow variable int rc; ^ Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Fixes: 523e594d9cc0 ("cxl/pci: Implement wait for media active") Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164944636936.455177.14136200464724208233.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Emit device serial numberDan Williams
Per the CXL specification (8.1.12.2 Memory Device PCIe Capabilities and Extended Capabilities) the Device Serial Number capability is mandatory. Emit it for user tooling to identify devices. It is reasonable to ask whether the attribute should be added to the list of PCI sysfs device attributes. The PCI layer can optionally emit it too, but the CXL subsystem is aiming to preserve its independence and the possibility of CXL topologies with non-PCI devices in it. To date that has only proven useful for the 'cxl_test' model, but as can be seen with seen with ACPI0016 devices, sometimes all that is needed is a platform firmware table to point to CXL Component Registers in MMIO space to define a "CXL" device. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164366608838.196598.16856227191534267098.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Implement wait for media activeBen Widawsky
CXL 2.0 8.1.3.8.2 states: Memory_Active: When set, indicates that the CXL Range 1 memory is fully initialized and available for software use. Must be set within Range 1. Memory_Active_Timeout of deassertion of reset to CXL device if CXL.mem HwInit Mode=1 Unfortunately, Memory_Active can take quite a long time depending on media size (up to 256s per 2.0 spec). Provide a callback for the eventual establishment of CXL.mem operations via the 'cxl_mem' driver the 'struct cxl_memdev'. The implementation waits for 60s by default for now and can be overridden by the mbox_ready_time module parameter. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> [djbw: switch to sleeping wait] Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298427373.3018233.9309741847039301834.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory infoBen Widawsky
Before CXL 2.0 HDM Decoder Capability mechanisms can be utilized in a device the driver must determine that the device is ready for CXL.mem operation and that platform firmware, or some other agent, has established an active decode via the legacy CXL 1.1 decoder mechanism. This legacy mechanism is defined in the CXL DVSEC as a set of range registers and status bits that take time to settle after a reset. Validate the CXL memory decode setup via the DVSEC and cache it for later consideration by the cxl_mem driver (to be added). Failure to validate is not fatal to the cxl_pci driver since that is only providing CXL command support over PCI.mmio, and might be needed to rectify CXL DVSEC validation problems. Any potential ranges that the device is already claiming via DVSEC need to be reconciled with the dynamic provisioning ranges provided by platform firmware (like ACPI CEDT.CFMWS). Leave that reconciliation to the cxl_mem driver. [djbw: shorten defines] [djbw: change precise spin wait to generous msleep] Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> [djbw: clarify changelog] Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164375911821.559935.7375160041663453400.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Cache device DVSEC offsetBen Widawsky
The PCIe device DVSEC, defined in the CXL 2.0 spec, 8.1.3 is required to be implemented by CXL 2.0 endpoint devices. In preparation for consuming this information in a new cxl_mem driver, retrieve the CXL DVSEC position and warn about the implications of not finding it. Allow for mailbox operation even if the CXL DVSEC is missing. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164375309615.513620.7874131241128599893.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Store component register base in cxldsBen Widawsky
In preparation for defining a cxl_port object to represent the decoder resources of a memory expander capture the component register base address. The port driver uses the component register base to enumerate the HDM Decoder Capability structure. Unlike other cxl_port objects the endpoint port decodes from upstream SPA to downstream DPA rather than upstream port to downstream port. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [djbw: clarify changelog] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164375084181.484304.3919737667590006795.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Rename pci.h to cxlpci.hDan Williams
Similar to the mem.h rename, if the core wants to reuse definitions from drivers/cxl/pci.h it is unable to use <pci.h> as that collides with archs that have an arch/$arch/include/asm/pci.h, like MIPS. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298422510.3018233.14693126572756675563.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/acpi: Map component registers for Root PortsBen Widawsky
This implements the TODO in cxl_acpi for mapping component registers. cxl_acpi becomes the second consumer of CXL register block enumeration (cxl_pci being the first). Moving the functionality to cxl_core allows both of these drivers to use the functionality. Equally importantly it allows cxl_core to use the functionality in the future. CXL 2.0 root ports are similar to CXL 2.0 Downstream Ports with the main distinction being they're a part of the CXL 2.0 host bridge. While mapping their component registers is not immediately useful for the CXL drivers, the movement of register block enumeration into core is a vital step towards HDM decoder programming. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [djbw: fix cxl_regmap_to_base() failure cases] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298415080.3018233.14694957480228676592.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl: Flesh out register namesBen Widawsky
Get a better naming scheme in place for upcoming additions. By dropping redundant usages of CXL and DVSEC where appropriate we can get more concise and also more grepable defines. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298414022.3018233.15522855498759815097.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Defer mailbox status checks to command timeoutsDan Williams
Device status can change without warning at any point in time. This effectively means that no amount of status checking before a command is submitted can guarantee that the device is not in an error condition when the command is later submitted. The clearest signal that a device is not able to process commands is if it fails to process commands. With the above understanding in hand, update cxl_pci_setup_mailbox() to validate the readiness of the mailbox once at the beginning of time, and then use timeouts and busy sequencing errors as the only occasions to report status. Just as before, unless and until the driver gains a reset recovery path, doorbell clearing failures by the device are fatal to mailbox operations. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298413480.3018233.9643395389297971819.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-08cxl/pci: Implement Interface Ready TimeoutBen Widawsky
The original driver implementation used the doorbell timeout for the Mailbox Interface Ready bit to piggy back off of, since the latter does not have a defined timeout. This functionality, introduced in commit 8adaf747c9f0 ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities"), needs improvement as the recent "Add Mailbox Ready Time" ECN timeout indicates that the mailbox ready time can be significantly longer that 2 seconds. While the specification limits the maximum timeout to 256s, the cxl_pci driver gives up on the mailbox after 60s. This value corresponds with important timeout values already present in the kernel. A module parameter is provided as an emergency override and represents the default Linux policy for all devices. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [djbw: add modparam, drop check_device_status()] Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164367306565.208548.1932299464604450843.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-11-15cxl/memdev: Change cxl_mem to a more descriptive nameIra Weiny
The 'struct cxl_mem' object actually represents the state of a CXL device within the driver. Comments indicating that 'struct cxl_mem' is a device itself are incorrect. It is data layered on top of a CXL Memory Expander class device. Rename it 'struct cxl_dev_state'. The 'struct' cxl_memdev' structure represents a Linux CXL memory device object, and it uses services and information provided by 'struct cxl_dev_state'. Update the structure name, function names, and the kdocs to reflect the real uses of this structure. Some helper functions that were previously prefixed "cxl_mem_" are renamed to just "cxl_". Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211102202901.3675568-3-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Use pci core's DVSEC functionalityBen Widawsky
Reduce maintenance burden of DVSEC query implementation by using the centralized PCI core implementation. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> [djbw: kill cxl_pci_dvsec()] Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163379788528.692348.11581080806976608802.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Split cxl_pci_setup_regs()Ben Widawsky
In preparation for moving parts of register mapping to cxl_core, split cxl_pci_setup_regs() into a helper that finds register blocks, (cxl_find_regblock()), and a generic wrapper that probes the precise register sets within a block (cxl_setup_regs()). Move the actual mapping (cxl_map_regs()) of the only register-set that cxl_pci cares about (memory device registers) up a level from the former cxl_pci_setup_regs() into cxl_pci_probe(). With this change the unused component registers are no longer mapped, but the helpers are primed to move into the core. [djbw: drop cxl_map_regs() for component registers] Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> [djbw: rebase on the cxl_register_map refactor] Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163434053788.914258.18412599112859205220.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Add @base to cxl_register_mapDan Williams
In addition to carrying @barno, @block_offset, and @reg_type, add @base to keep all map/unmap parameters in one object. The helpers cxl_{map,unmap}_regblock() handle adjusting @base to the @block_offset at map and unmap time. Document that @base incorporates @block_offset so that downstream consumers of a mapped cxl_register_map instance do not need perform any fixups / can use @base directly. Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163433497228.889435.11271988238496181536.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_mapBen Widawsky
The structure exists to pass around information about register mapping. Use it for passing @barno and @block_offset, and eliminate duplicate local variables. The helpers that use @map do not care about @cxlm, so just pass them a pdev instead. [djbw: reorder before cxl_pci_setup_regs() refactor to improver readability] Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> [djbw: separate @base conversion] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163416901172.806743.10056306321247850914.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Remove pci request/release regionsBen Widawsky
Quoting Dan, "... the request + release regions should probably just be dropped. It's not like any of the register enumeration would collide with someone else who already has the registers mapped. The collision only comes when the registers are mapped for their final usage, and that will have more precision in the request." Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163379785872.692348.8981679111988251260.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Fix NULL vs ERR_PTR confusionDan Williams
cxl_pci_map_regblock() may return an ERR_PTR(), but cxl_pci_setup_regs() is only prepared for NULL as the error case. Pick the minimal fix for -stable backport purposes and just have cxl_pci_map_regblock() return NULL for errors. Fixes: f8a7e8c29be8 ("cxl/pci: Reserve all device regions at once") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163433325724.834522.17809774578178224149.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-10-29cxl/pci: Remove dev_dbg for unknown register blocksBen Widawsky
While interesting to driver developers, the dev_dbg message doesn't do much except clutter up logs. This information should be attainable through sysfs, and someday lspci like utilities. This change additionally helps reduce the LOC in a subsequent patch to refactor some of cxl_pci register mapping. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163379784717.692348.3478221381958300790.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/pci: Disambiguate cxl_pci further from cxl_memBen Widawsky
Commit 21e9f76733a8 ("cxl: Rename mem to pci") introduced the cxl_pci driver which had formerly been named cxl_mem. At the time, the goal was to be as light touch as possible because there were other patches in flight. Since things have settled now, and a new cxl_mem driver will be introduced shortly, spend the LOC now to clean up the existing names. While here, fix the kernel docs to explain the situation better after the core rework that has already landed. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913163324.1008564-4-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/pci: Use module_pci_driverDan Williams
Now that cxl_mem_{init,exit} no longer need to manage debugfs, switch back to the smaller form of the boiler plate. Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116435825.2460985.7201322215431441130.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/mbox: Move mailbox and other non-PCI specific infrastructure to the coreDan Williams
Now that the internals of mailbox operations are abstracted from the PCI specifics a bulk of infrastructure can move to the core. The CXL_PMEM driver intends to proxy LIBNVDIMM UAPI and driver requests to the equivalent functionality provided by the CXL hardware mailbox interface. In support of that intent move the mailbox implementation to a shared location for the CXL_PCI driver native IOCTL path and CXL_PMEM nvdimm command proxy path to share. A unit test framework seeks to implement a unit test backend transport for mailbox commands to communicate mocked up payloads. It can reuse all of the mailbox infrastructure minus the PCI specifics, so that also gets moved to the core. Finally with the mailbox infrastructure and ioctl handling being transport generic there is no longer any need to pass file file_operations to devm_cxl_add_memdev(). That allows all the ioctl boilerplate to move into the core for unit test reuse. No functional change intended, just code movement. Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116435233.2460985.16197340449713287180.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/pci: Drop idr.hDan Williams
Commit 3d135db51024 ("cxl/core: Move memdev management to core") left this straggling include for cxl_memdev setup. Clean it up. Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116434668.2460985.12264757586266849616.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/mbox: Introduce the mbox_send operationDan Williams
In preparation for implementing a unit test backend transport for ioctl operations, and making the mailbox available to the cxl/pmem infrastructure, move the existing PCI specific portion of mailbox handling to an "mbox_send" operation. With this split all the PCI-specific transport details are comprehended by a single operation and the rest of the mailbox infrastructure is 'struct cxl_mem' and 'struct cxl_memdev' generic. Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116434098.2460985.9004760022659400540.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/pci: Clean up cxl_mem_get_partition_info()Dan Williams
Commit 0b9159d0ff21 ("cxl/pci: Store memory capacity values") missed updating the kernel-doc for 'struct cxl_mem' leading to the following warnings: ./scripts/kernel-doc -v drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h 2>&1 | grep warn drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'total_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'volatile_only_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'persistent_only_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'partition_align_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'active_volatile_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'active_persistent_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_volatile_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h:107: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_persistent_bytes' not described in 'cxl_mem' Also, it is redundant to describe those same parameters in the kernel-doc for cxl_mem_get_partition_info(). Given the only user of that routine updates the values in @cxlm, just do that implicitly internal to the helper. Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reported-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163157174216.2653013.1277706528753990974.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-21cxl/pci: Make 'struct cxl_mem' device type genericDan Williams
In preparation for adding a unit test provider of a cxl_memdev, convert the 'struct cxl_mem' driver context to carry a generic device rather than a pci device. Note, some dev_dbg() lines needed extra reformatting per clang-format. This conversion also allows the cxl_mem_create() and devm_cxl_add_memdev() calling conventions to be simplified. The "host" for a cxl_memdev, must be the same device for the driver that allocated @cxlm. Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116432973.2460985.7553504957932024222.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-07cxl/pci: Fix debug message in cxl_probe_regs()Li Qiang (Johnny Li)
Indicator string for mbox and memdev register set to status incorrectly in error message. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 30af97296f48 ("cxl/pci: Map registers based on capabilities") Signed-off-by: Li Qiang (Johnny Li) <johnny.li@montage-tech.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163072205089.2250120.8103605864156687395.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-09-07cxl/pci: Fix lockdown levelDan Williams
A proposed rework of security_locked_down() users identified that the cxl_pci driver was passing the wrong lockdown_reason. Update cxl_mem_raw_command_allowed() to fail raw command access when raw pci access is also disabled. Fixes: 13237183c735 ("cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command") Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163072204525.2250120.16615792476976546735.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-10cxl/mem: Adjust ram/pmem range to represent DPA rangesIra Weiny
CXL spec defines the volatile DPA range to be 0 to Volatile memory size. It further defines the persistent DPA range to follow directly after the end of the Volatile DPA through the persistent memory size. Essentially Volatile DPA range = [0, Volatile size) Persistent DPA range = [Volatile size, Volatile size + Persistent size) Adjust the pmem_range start to reflect this and remote the TODO. Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617221620.1904031-4-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-10cxl/mem: Account for partitionable space in ram/pmem rangesIra Weiny
Memory devices may specify volatile only, persistent only, and partitionable space which when added together result in a total capacity. If Identify Memory Device.Partition Alignment != 0 the device supports partitionable space. This partitionable space can be split between volatile and persistent space. The total volatile and persistent sizes are reported in Get Partition Info. ie active volatile memory = volatile only + partitionable volatile active persistent memory = persistent only + partitionable persistent Define cxl_mem_get_partition(), check for partitionable support, and use cxl_mem_get_partition() if applicable. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-07cxl/pci: Store memory capacity valuesIra Weiny
The Identify Memory Device command returns information about the volatile only and persistent only memory capacities. Store those values in the cxl_mem structure for later use. While at it, reuse those calculations to calculate the ram and pmem ranges. Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617221620.1904031-2-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-06cxl/pci: Simplify register setupBen Widawsky
It is desirable to retain the mappings from the calling function. By simplifying this code, it will be much more straightforward to do that. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210716231548.174778-3-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-06cxl/pci: Ignore unknown register block typesBen Widawsky
In an effort to explicit avoid supporting vendor specific register blocks (which can happily be mapped from userspace), entirely skip probing unknown types. The secondary benefit of this will be revealed in the future with code simplification. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210716231548.174778-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-06cxl/core: Move memdev management to coreBen Widawsky
The motivation for moving cxl_memdev allocation to the core (beyond better file organization of sysfs attributes in core/ and drivers in cxl/), is that device lifetime is longer than module lifetime. The cxl_pci module should be free to come and go without needing to coordinate with devices that need the text associated with cxl_memdev_release() to stay resident. The move fixes a use after free bug when looping driver load / unload with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y. Another motivation for disconnecting cxl_memdev creation from cxl_pci is to enable other drivers, like a unit test driver, to registers memdevs. Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162792540495.368511.9748638751088219595.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-06cxl/pci: Introduce cdevm_file_operationsDan Williams
In preparation for moving cxl_memdev allocation to the core, introduce cdevm_file_operations to coordinate file operations shutdown relative to driver data release. The motivation for moving cxl_memdev allocation to the core (beyond better file organization of sysfs attributes in core/ and drivers in cxl/), is that device lifetime is longer than module lifetime. The cxl_pci module should be free to come and go without needing to coordinate with devices that need the text associated with cxl_memdev_release() to stay resident. The move will fix a use after free bug when looping driver load / unload with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y. Another motivation for passing in file_operations to the core cxl_memdev creation flow is to allow for alternate drivers, like unit test code, to define their own ioctl backends. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162792539962.368511.2962268954245340288.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-08-06cxl: Move cxl_core to new directoryBen Widawsky
CXL core is growing, and it's already arguably unmanageable. To support future growth, move core functionality to a new directory and rename the file to represent just bus support. Future work will remove non-bus functionality. Note that mem.h is renamed to cxlmem.h to avoid a namespace collision with the global ARCH=um mem.h header. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162792537866.368511.8915631504621088321.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-17cxl/pci: Rename CXL REGLOC IDBen Widawsky
The current naming is confusing and wrong. The Register Locator is identified by the DSVSEC identifier, not an offset. Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618003009.956929-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-15cxl/pmem: Register 'pmem' / cxl_nvdimm devicesDan Williams
While a memX device on /sys/bus/cxl represents a CXL memory expander control interface, a pmemX device represents the persistent memory sub-functionality. It bridges the CXL subystem to the libnvdimm nmemX control interface. With this skeleton ndctl can now see persistent memory devices on a "CXL" bus. Later patches add support for translating libnvdimm native commands to CXL commands. # ndctl list -BDiu -b CXL { "provider":"CXL", "dev":"ndbus1", "dimms":[ { "dev":"nmem1", "state":"disabled" }, { "dev":"nmem0", "state":"disabled" } ] } Given nvdimm_bus_unregister() removes all devices on an ndbus0 the cxl_pmem infrastructure needs to arrange ->remove() to be triggered on cxl_nvdimm devices to keep their enabled state synchronized with the registration state of their corresponding device on the nvdimm_bus. In other words, always arrange for cxl_nvdimm_driver.remove() to unregister nvdimms from an nvdimm_bus ahead of the bus being unregistered. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162380012696.3039556.4293801691038740850.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-14cxl/pci: Add media provisioning required commandsBen Widawsky
Some of the commands have already been defined for the support of RAW commands (to be blocked). Unlike their usage in the RAW interface, when used through the supported interface, they will be coordinated and marshalled along with other commands being issued by userspace and the driver itself. That coordination will be added later. The list of commands was determined based on the learnings from libnvdimm and this list is provided directly from Dan. Recommended-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210413140907.534404-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-05cxl/pci: Add HDM decoder capabilitiesBen Widawsky
An HDM decoder is defined in the CXL 2.0 specification as a mechanism that allow devices and upstream ports to claim memory address ranges and participate in interleave sets. HDM decoder registers are within the component register block defined in CXL 2.0 8.2.3 CXL 2.0 Component Registers as part of the CXL.cache and CXL.mem subregion. The Component Register Block is found via the Register Locator DVSEC in a similar fashion to how the CXL Device Register Block is found. The primary difference is the capability id size of the Component Register Block is a single DWORD instead of 4 DWORDS. It's now possible to configure a CXL type 3 device's HDM decoder. Such programming is expected for CXL devices with persistent memory, and hot plugged CXL devices that participate in CXL.mem with volatile memory. Add probe and mapping functions for the component register blocks. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Co-developed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210528004922.3980613-6-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-05cxl/pci: Reserve individual register block regionsIra Weiny
Some hardware implementations mix component and device registers into the same BAR and the driver stack is going to need independent mapping implementations for those 2 cases. Furthermore, it will be nice to have finer grained mappings should user space want to map some register blocks. Now that individual register blocks are mapped; those blocks regions should be reserved individually to fully separate the register blocks. Release the 'global' memory reservation and create individual register block region reservations through devm. NOTE: pci_release_mem_regions() is still compatible with pcim_enable_device() because it removes the automatic region release when called. So preserve the pcim_enable_device() so that the pcim interface can be called if needed. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210604005316.4187340-1-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>