aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-04-13pwm: Make .get_state() callback return an error codeUwe Kleine-König
[ Upstream commit 6c452cff79f8bf1c0146fda598d32061cfd25443 ] .get_state() might fail in some cases. To make it possible that a driver signals such a failure change the prototype of .get_state() to return an error code. This patch was created using coccinelle and the following semantic patch: @p1@ identifier getstatefunc; identifier driver; @@ struct pwm_ops driver = { ..., .get_state = getstatefunc ,... }; @p2@ identifier p1.getstatefunc; identifier chip, pwm, state; @@ -void +int getstatefunc(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) { ... - return; + return 0; ... } plus the actual change of the prototype in include/linux/pwm.h (plus some manual fixing of indentions and empty lines). So for now all drivers return success unconditionally. They are adapted in the following patches to make the changes easier reviewable. Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com> Acked-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221130152148.2769768-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Stable-dep-of: 6f5793798014 ("pwm: hibvt: Explicitly set .polarity in .get_state()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-09-28pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masksAndy Shevchenko
Make use of the GENMASK() (far less error-prone, far more concise). Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-09-28pwm: lpss: Move resource mapping to the glue driversAndy Shevchenko
Move resource mapping to the glue drivers which helps to transform pwm_lpss_probe() to pure library function that may be used by others without need of specific resource management. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-09-28pwm: lpss: Move exported symbols to PWM_LPSS namespaceAndy Shevchenko
Avoid unnecessary pollution of the global symbol namespace by moving library functions in to a specific namespace and import that into the drivers that make use of the functions. For more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/760045/ Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-09-28pwm: lpss: Deduplicate board info data structuresUwe Kleine-König
Move the board info structures from the glue drivers to the common library and hence deduplicate configuration data. For the Intel Braswell case the ACPI version should be used. Because switch to ACPI/PCI is done in BIOS while quite likely the rest of AML code is the same, meaning similar issue might be observed. There is no bug report due to no PCI enabled device in the wild, Andy thinks, and only reference boards can be tested, so nobody really cares about Intel Braswell PCI case. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-28pwm: lpss: Simplify using devm_pwmchip_add()Uwe Kleine-König
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-04-09pwm: lpss: Don't modify HW state in .remove callbackUwe Kleine-König
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do, this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level driver. So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-03-22pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamicallyUwe Kleine-König
Since commit 5e5da1e9fbee ("pwm: ab8500: Explicitly allocate pwm chip base dynamically") all drivers use dynamic ID allocation explicitly. New drivers are supposed to do the same, so remove support for driver specified base IDs and drop all assignments in the low-level drivers. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-12-17pwm: lpss: Log error from pwm_lpss_is_updating() if the update bit is still setHans de Goede
pwm_lpss_is_updating() does a sanity check which should never fail. If the check does actually fail that is worth logging an error, especially since this means that we will skip making the requested changes to the PWM settings. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-09-06pwm: lpss: Remove suspend/resume handlersHans de Goede
PWM controller drivers should not restore the PWM state on resume. The convention is that PWM consumers do this by calling pwm_apply_state(), so that it can be done at the exact moment when the consumer needs the state to be stored, avoiding e.g. backlight flickering. The only in kernel consumers of the pwm-lpss code, the i915 driver and the pwm-class sysfs interface code both correctly restore the state on resume, so there is no need to do this in the pwm-lpss code. More-over the removed resume handler is buggy, since it blindly restores the ctrl-register contents without setting the update bit, which is necessary to get the controller to actually use/apply the restored base-unit and on-time-div values. Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-8-hdegoede@redhat.com
2020-09-06pwm: lpss: Make pwm_lpss_apply() not rely on existing hardware stateHans de Goede
Before this commit pwm_lpss_apply() was assuming 2 pre-conditions were met by the existing hardware state: 1. That the base-unit and on-time-div read back from the control register are those actually in use, so that it can skip setting the update bit if the read-back value matches the desired values. 2. That the controller is enabled when the cached pwm_state.enabled says that the controller is enabled. As the long history of fixes for subtle (often suspend/resume) lpss-pwm issues shows, these assumptions are not necessary always true. 1. Specifically is not true on some (*) Cherry Trail devices with a nasty GFX0._PS3 method which: a. saves the ctrl reg value. b. sets the base-unit to 0 and writes the update bit to apply/commit c. restores the original ctrl value without setting the update bit, so that the 0 base-unit value is still in use. 2. Assumption 2. currently is true, but only because of the code which saves/restores the state on suspend/resume. By convention restoring the PWM state should be done by the PWM consumer and the presence of this code in the pmw-lpss driver is a bug. Therefor the save/restore code will be dropped in the next patch in this series, after which this assumption also is no longer true. This commit changes the pwm_lpss_apply() to not make any assumptions about the state the hardware is in. Instead it makes pwm_lpss_apply() always fully program the PWM controller, making it much less fragile. *) Seen on the Acer One 10 S1003, Lenovo Ideapad Miix 310 and 320 models and various Medion models. Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-7-hdegoede@redhat.com
2020-09-06pwm: lpss: Add pwm_lpss_prepare_enable() helperHans de Goede
In the not-enabled -> enabled path pwm_lpss_apply() needs to get a runtime-pm reference; and then on any errors it needs to release it again. This leads to somewhat hard to read code. This commit introduces a new pwm_lpss_prepare_enable() helper and moves all the steps necessary for the not-enabled -> enabled transition there, so that we can error check the entire transition in a single place and only have one pm_runtime_put() on failure call site. While working on this I noticed that the enabled -> enabled (update settings) path was quite similar, so I've added an enable parameter to the new pwm_lpss_prepare_enable() helper, which allows using it in that path too. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-6-hdegoede@redhat.com
2020-09-06pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register valueHans de Goede
When the user requests a high enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value of 0. But according to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency. Adding 0 to the counter is a no-op. The data-sheet even explicitly states that writing 0 to the base_unit bits will result in the PWM outputting a continuous 0 signal. When the user requestes a low enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value which is bigger then base_unit_range - 1. Currently the codes for this deals with this by applying a mask: base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1); But this means that we let the value overflow the range, we throw away the higher bits and store whatever value is left in the lower bits into the register leading to a random output frequency, rather then clamping the output frequency to the highest frequency which the hardware can do. This commit fixes both issues by clamping the base_unit value to be between 1 and (base_unit_range - 1). Fixes: 684309e5043e ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit") Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-5-hdegoede@redhat.com
2020-09-06pwm: lpss: Fix off by one error in base_unit math in pwm_lpss_prepare()Hans de Goede
According to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency. So assuming e.g. a 16 bit counter this means that if base_unit is set to 1, after 65535 input clock-cycles the counter has been increased from 0 to 65535 and it will overflow on the next cycle, so it will overflow after every 65536 clock cycles and thus the calculations done in pwm_lpss_prepare() should use 65536 and not 65535. This commit fixes this. Note this also aligns the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() with those in pwm_lpss_get_state(). Note this effectively reverts commit 684309e5043e ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit"). The next patch in this series really fixes the potential overflow of the base_unit value. Fixes: 684309e5043e ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit") Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
2020-06-02pwm: lpss: Fix get_state runtime-pm reference handlingHans de Goede
Before commit cfc4c189bc70 ("pwm: Read initial hardware state at request time"), a driver's get_state callback would get called once per PWM from pwmchip_add(). pwm-lpss' runtime-pm code was relying on this, getting a runtime-pm ref for PWMs which are enabled at probe time from within its get_state callback, before enabling runtime-pm. The change to calling get_state at request time causes a number of problems: 1. PWMs enabled at probe time may get runtime suspended before they are requested, causing e.g. a LCD backlight controlled by the PWM to turn off. 2. When the request happens when the PWM has been runtime suspended, the ctrl register will read all 1 / 0xffffffff, causing get_state to store bogus values in the pwm_state. 3. get_state was using an async pm_runtime_get() call, because it assumed that runtime-pm has not been enabled yet. If shortly after the request an apply call is made, then the pwm_lpss_is_updating() check may trigger because the resume triggered by the pm_runtime_get() call is not complete yet, so the ctrl register still reads all 1 / 0xffffffff. This commit fixes these issues by moving the initial pm_runtime_get() call for PWMs which are enabled at probe time to the pwm_lpss_probe() function; and by making get_state take a runtime-pm ref before reading the ctrl reg. BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828927 Fixes: cfc4c189bc70 ("pwm: Read initial hardware state at request time") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-09-21pwm: Ensure pwm_apply_state() doesn't modify the state argumentUwe Kleine-König
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a driver doing: #define PERIOD 5000000 #define DUTY_LITTLE 10 ... struct pwm_state state = { .period = PERIOD, .duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE, .polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL, .enabled = true, }; pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state); ... state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2; pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state); For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call. So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all drivers' .apply callbacks. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500Thomas Gleixner
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-10-16pwm: lpss: Only set update bit if we are actually changing the settingsHans de Goede
According to the datasheet the update bit must be set if the on-time-div or the base-unit changes. Now that we properly order device resume on Cherry Trail so that the GFX0 _PS0 method no longer exits with an error, we end up with a sequence of events where we are writing the same values twice in a row. First the _PS0 method restores the duty cycle of 0% the GPU driver set on suspend and then the GPU driver first updates just the enabled bit in the pwm_state from 0 to 1, causing us to write the same values again, before restoring the pre-suspend duty-cycle in a separate pwm_apply call. When writing the update bit the second time, without changing any of the values the update bit clears immediately / instantly, instead of staying 1 for a while as usual. After this the next setting of the update bit seems to be ignored, causing the restoring of the pre-suspend duty-cycle to not get applied. This makes the backlight come up with a 0% dutycycle after suspend/resume. Any further brightness changes after this do work. This commit moves the setting of the update bit into pwm_lpss_prepare() and only sets the bit if we have actually changed any of the values. This avoids the setting of the update bit the second time we configure the PWM to 0% dutycycle, this fixes the backlight coming up with 0% duty-cycle after a suspend/resume. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2018-10-12pwm: lpss: Add get_state callbackHans de Goede
Add a get_state callback so that the initial state correctly reflects the actual hardware state. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2018-10-12pwm: lpss: Release runtime-pm reference from the driver's remove callbackHans de Goede
For each pwm output which gets enabled through pwm_lpss_apply(), we do a pm_runtime_get_sync(). This commit adds pm_runtime_put() calls to pwm_lpss_remove() to balance these when the driver gets removed with some of the outputs still enabled. Fixes: f080be27d7d9 ("pwm: lpss: Add support for runtime PM") Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2018-10-12pwm: lpss: Move struct pwm_lpss_chip definition to the header fileHans de Goede
Move struct pwm_lpss_chip definition from pwm-lpss.c to pwm-lpss.h, so that the pci/platform drivers can access the info member (struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *). This is a preparation patch for adding platform specific quirks, which the drivers need access to, to pwm_lpss_boardinfo. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2018-06-06pwm: lpss: platform: Save/restore the ctrl register over a suspend/resumeHans de Goede
On some devices the contents of the ctrl register get lost over a suspend/resume and the PWM comes back up disabled after the resume. This is seen on some Bay Trail devices with the PWM in ACPI enumerated mode, so it shows up as a platform device instead of a PCI device. If we still think it is enabled and then try to change the duty-cycle after this, we end up with a "PWM_SW_UPDATE was not cleared" error and the PWM is stuck in that state from then on. This commit adds suspend and resume pm callbacks to the pwm-lpss-platform code, which save/restore the ctrl register over a suspend/resume, fixing this. Note that: 1) There is no need to do this over a runtime suspend, since we only runtime suspend when disabled and then we properly set the enable bit and reprogram the timings when we re-enable the PWM. 2) This may be happening on more systems then we realize, but has been covered up sofar by a bug in the acpi-lpss.c code which was save/restoring the regular device registers instead of the lpss private registers due to lpss_device_desc.prv_offset not being set. This is fixed by a later patch in this series. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-04-06pwm: lpss: Set enable-bit before waiting for update-bit to go lowHans de Goede
At least on cherrytrail, the update bit will never go low when the enabled bit is not set. This causes the backlight on my cube iwork8 air tablet to never turn on again after being turned off because in the pwm_lpss_apply enable path pwm_lpss_update will fail causing an error exit and the enable-bit to never get set. Any following pwm_lpss_apply calls will fail the pwm_lpss_is_updating check. Since the docs say that the update bit should be set before the enable-bit, split pwm_lpss_update into setting the update-bit and pwm_lpss_wait_for_update, and move the pwm_lpss_wait_for_update call in the enable path to after setting the enable-bit. Fixes: 10d56a4 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid reconfiguring while UPDATE bit...") Cc: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka.koskinen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: lpss: Do not export board infos for different PWM typesAndy Shevchenko
The PWM LPSS probe drivers just pass a pointer to the exported board info structures to pwm_lpss_probe() based on device PCI or ACPI ID. In order to remove the knowledge of specific devices from library part of the driver and reduce noise in exported namespace just duplicate the board info structures and stop exporting them. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: lpss: Avoid reconfiguring while UPDATE bit is still enabledIlkka Koskinen
PWM Configuration register has SW_UPDATE bit that is set when a new configuration is written to the register. The bit is automatically cleared at the start of the next output cycle by the IP block. If one writes a new configuration to the register while it still has the bit enabled, PWM may freeze. That is, while one can still write to the register, it won't have an effect. Thus, we try to sleep long enough that the bit gets cleared and make sure the bit is not enabled while we update the configuration. Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Richard Griffiths <richard.a.griffiths@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka.koskinen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: lpss: Switch to new atomic APIAndy Shevchenko
Instead of doing things separately, which is not so reliable on some platforms, switch the driver to use new atomic API, i.e. ->apply() callback. The change has been tested on Intel platforms such as Broxton, BayTrail, and Merrifield. Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: lpss: Allow duty cycle to be 0Andy Shevchenko
A duty cycle is represented by values [0..<period>] which reflects [0%..100%]. 0% of the duty cycle means always off (logical "0") on output. Allow this in the driver. Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unitAndy Shevchenko
The resolution of base_unit is derived from base_unit_bits and thus must be equal to (2^base_unit_bits - 1). Otherwise frequency and therefore base_unit might potentially overflow. Prevent the above by substracting 1 in all cases where base_unit_bits or derivative is used. Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2016-07-11pwm: lpss: Move clk_rate check to ->probe()Andy Shevchenko
There is no need to check each time if the clk_rate defined or not when we call pwm_lpss_config(). Move the check to ->probe() instead. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2016-07-11pwm: lpss: Prevent on_time_div overflow on lower frequenciesMika Westerberg
If duty_ns is large enough multiplying it by 255 overflows and results wrong duty cycle value being programmed. For example with 10ms duty when period is 20ms (50%) we get 255 * 10000000 / 20000000 = -87 because 255 * 10000000 overlows int. Whereas correct value should be 255 * 10000000 / 20000000 = 127 Fix this by using unsigned long long as type for on_time_div and changing integer literals to use proper type annotation. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2016-07-11pwm: lpss: Fix base_unit calculation for PWM frequencyDan O'Donovan
The base_unit calculation applies an offset of 0x2 which adds significant error for lower frequencies and doesn't appear to be warranted - rounding the division result gives a correct value. Also, the upper limit check for base_unit is off-by-one; the upper nibble of base_unit is invalid if >=128 according to the Table 88 in the Z8000 Processor Series Datasheet Volume 1 (Rev. 2). Verified on UP Board (Cherry Trail) and Minnowboard Max (Bay Trail). Signed-off-by: Dan O'Donovan <dan@emutex.com> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-12-16pwm: lpss: Rework the sequence of programming PWM_SW_UPDATEMika Westerberg
Setting of PWM_SW_UPDATE is bit different in Intel Broxton compared to the previous generation SoCs. Previously it was OK to set the bit many times (from userspace via sysfs for example) before the PWM is actually enabled. Starting from Intel Broxton it seems that we must set PWM_SW_UPDATE only once before the PWM is enabled. Otherwise it is possible that the PWM does not start properly. Change the sequence of how PWM_SW_UPDATE is programmed so that we only set it in pwm_lpss_config() when the PWM is already enabled. The initial setting of PWM_SW_UPDATE will be done when PWM gets enabled. This should make the driver work with the previous generation Intel SoCs and Broxton. Add also small delay after the bit is set to let the hardware propagate it properly. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-12-16pwm: lpss: Update PWM setting for Broxtonqipeng.zha
For Broxton PWM controller, base unit is defined as 8-bit integer and 14-bit fraction, so need to update base unit setting to output wave with right frequency. Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-12-16pwm: lpss: Remove ->free() callbackMika Westerberg
The LPSS PWM driver calls pwm_lpss_disable() when the PWM device is released (for example unexported from sysfs). This in turn calls pm_runtime_put() which makes runtime PM count to be unbalanced if the device has not been enabled at this point. This is easy to reproduce: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # echo 0 > unexport The count is unbalanced and prevents the PWM device from being powered on next time. Fix this by removing ->free() callback. There are no resources to be released anyway. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-06pwm: lpss: Add support for runtime PMQipeng Zha
To be able to save some power when PWM is not in use, add support for runtime PM for this driver. This also allows the platform to transition to low power S0ix states when the system is idle. Signed-off-by: Huiquan Zhong <huiquan.zhong@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-06pwm: lpss: Support all four PWMs on Intel BroxtonMika Westerberg
Intel Broxton has similar PWM than Intel Braswell but instead of one it has four PWMs included in one PCI/ACPI device. This patch adds support for all the four PWMs and changes the PCI part of the driver to use 'pwm_lpss_bxt_info' instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-06pwm: lpss: Add support for multiple PWMsMika Westerberg
New Intel SoCs such as Broxton will have four PWMs per PCI (or ACPI) device. Each PWM has 1k of register space allocated from the parent device. Add support for this. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-08-25pwm: lpss: use c99 initializers in structuresJulia Lawall
Use c99 initializers for structures. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @decl@ identifier i1,fld; type T; field list[n] fs; @@ struct i1 { fs T fld; ...}; @bad@ identifier decl.i1,i2; expression e; initializer list[decl.n] is; @@ struct i1 i2 = { is, + .fld = e - e ,...}; // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> [thierry.reding: rebased and applied same fix for Braswell] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-08-23pwm: lpss: Fix build failure on PowerPCThierry Reding
An x86 build seems to pull in the linux/io.h include indirectly. On PowerPC that doesn't happen and the build breaks due to the readl() and writel() functions not being declared. Fix this by explicitly including linux/io.h. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-08-23pwm: lpss: Properly split driver to partsAndy Shevchenko
The driver consists of core, PCI, and platform parts. It would be better to split them into separate files. The platform driver is now called pwm-lpss-platform. Thus, previously set CONFIG_PWM_LPSS=m is not enough to build it. But we are on the safe side since it seems no one from outside Intel is using it for now. While here, move to use macros module_pci_driver() and module_platform_driver(). Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> [thierry.reding: change select to depends on PWM_LPSS, cleanup] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-08-22pwm: lpss: Add ACPI and PCI IDs for Intel BraswellAlan Cox
This is pretty much the same as Baytrail PWM. Only difference is that the input clock runs on different frequency. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-08-07pwm: lpss: remove dependency on clk frameworkHeikki Krogerus
Unlike other Intel LPSS devices, the PWM does not have the clock dividers or the gate. All we get from the clock is the rate. Since PCI case uses the driver data to get the rate, we can drop the clk and use the same data also in case of ACPI. The frequency is the same. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-05-07pwm: lpss: Fix const qualifier and sparse warningsThierry Reding
Fixes the following warnings reported by the 0-DAY kernel build testing backend: drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c: In function 'pwm_lpss_probe_pci': >> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:2: warning: passing argument 3 of 'pwm_lpss_probe' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default] lpwm = pwm_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, &pdev->resource[0], info); ^ drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:130:30: note: expected 'struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *' but argument is of type 'const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *' static struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev, ^ >> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:143:28: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces) drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:143:28: expected struct pwm_lpss_chip * drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:143:28: got void [noderef] <asn:2>*regs >> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:63: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different modifiers) drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:63: expected struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *info drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:63: got struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo const *[assigned] info drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c: In function 'pwm_lpss_probe_pci': drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:2: warning: passing argument 3 of 'pwm_lpss_probe' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default] lpwm = pwm_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, &pdev->resource[0], info); ^ drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:130:30: note: expected 'struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *' but argument is of type 'const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *' static struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev, ^ Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-04-28pwm: lpss: Add support for PCI devicesAlan Cox
Not all systems enumerate the PWM devices via ACPI. They can also be exposed via the PCI interface. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2014-04-01pwm: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem PWMMika Westerberg
Add support for Intel Low Power I/O subsystem PWM controllers found on Intel BayTrail SoC. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chew, Kean Ho <kean.ho.chew@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>