From 6eda3dd33f8a0ce58ee56a11351758643a698db4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tiger Yang Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:21:23 +0800 Subject: ocfs2: do not overwrite error codes in ocfs2_init_acl Setting the acl while creating a new inode depends on the error codes of posix_acl_create_masq. This patch fix a issue of overwriting the error codes of it. Reported-by: Pawel Zawora Cc: [ .33, .34 ] Signed-off-by: Tiger Yang Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/acl.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c index da702294d7e7..5a2177833210 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ int ocfs2_init_acl(handle_t *handle, { struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); struct posix_acl *acl = NULL; - int ret = 0; + int ret = 0, ret2; mode_t mode; if (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) { @@ -381,7 +381,12 @@ int ocfs2_init_acl(handle_t *handle, mode = inode->i_mode; ret = posix_acl_create_masq(clone, &mode); if (ret >= 0) { - ret = ocfs2_acl_set_mode(inode, di_bh, handle, mode); + ret2 = ocfs2_acl_set_mode(inode, di_bh, handle, mode); + if (ret2) { + mlog_errno(ret2); + ret = ret2; + goto cleanup; + } if (ret > 0) { ret = ocfs2_set_acl(handle, inode, di_bh, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS, -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6d98c3ccb52f692f1a60339dde7c700686a5568b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wengang Wang Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:13:33 +0800 Subject: ocfs2/dlm: fix a dead lock When we have to take both dlm->master_lock and lockres->spinlock, take them in order lockres->spinlock and then dlm->master_lock. The patch fixes a violation of the rule. We can simply move taking dlm->master_lock to where we have dropped res->spinlock since when we access res->state and free mle memory we don't need master_lock's protection. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c index 94b97fc6a88e..6d098b89d46e 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c @@ -3050,8 +3050,6 @@ int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, /* check for pre-existing lock */ spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); res = __dlm_lookup_lockres(dlm, name, namelen, hash); - spin_lock(&dlm->master_lock); - if (res) { spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING) { @@ -3069,14 +3067,15 @@ int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); } + spin_lock(&dlm->master_lock); /* ignore status. only nonzero status would BUG. */ ret = dlm_add_migration_mle(dlm, res, mle, &oldmle, name, namelen, migrate->new_master, migrate->master); -unlock: spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock); +unlock: spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); if (oldmle) { -- cgit v1.2.3 From 7beaf243787f85a2ef9213ccf13ab4a243283fde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Srinivas Eeda Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:04:12 -0700 Subject: ocfs2 fix o2dlm dlm run purgelist (rev 3) This patch fixes two problems in dlm_run_purgelist 1. If a lockres is found to be in use, dlm_run_purgelist keeps trying to purge the same lockres instead of trying the next lockres. 2. When a lockres is found unused, dlm_run_purgelist releases lockres spinlock before setting DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF and calls dlm_purge_lockres. spinlock is reacquired but in this window lockres can get reused. This leads to BUG. This patch modifies dlm_run_purgelist to skip lockres if it's in use and purge next lockres. It also sets DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF before releasing the lockres spinlock protecting it from getting reused. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Eeda Acked-by: Sunil Mushran Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c index d4f73ca68fe5..dd78ca3f360f 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c @@ -152,45 +152,25 @@ void dlm_lockres_calc_usage(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); } -static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, +static void dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock_resource *res) { int master; int ret = 0; - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); - if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) { - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: tried to purge but not unused\n", - dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name); - __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); - BUG(); - } - - if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING) { - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: Delay dropref as this lockres is " - "being remastered\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len, - res->lockname.name); - /* Re-add the lockres to the end of the purge list */ - if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) { - list_del_init(&res->purge); - list_add_tail(&res->purge, &dlm->purge_list); - } - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); - return 0; - } + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock); + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); master = (res->owner == dlm->node_num); - if (!master) - res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); mlog(0, "purging lockres %.*s, master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, master); if (!master) { + res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; /* drop spinlock... retake below */ + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); spin_lock(&res->spinlock); @@ -208,31 +188,35 @@ static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: dlm_deref_lockres returned %d\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, ret); spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); } - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) { mlog(0, "removing lockres %.*s:%p from purgelist, " "master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, res, master); list_del_init(&res->purge); - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); dlm_lockres_put(res); dlm->purge_count--; - } else - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); + } + + if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) { + mlog(ML_ERROR, "found lockres %s:%.*s: in use after deref\n", + dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name); + __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); + BUG(); + } __dlm_unhash_lockres(res); /* lockres is not in the hash now. drop the flag and wake up * any processes waiting in dlm_get_lock_resource. */ if (!master) { - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); res->state &= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); wake_up(&res->wq); - } - return 0; + } else + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); } static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, @@ -251,17 +235,7 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, lockres = list_entry(dlm->purge_list.next, struct dlm_lock_resource, purge); - /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double - * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm - * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more - * refs on it -- there's no need to keep the lockres - * spinlock. */ spin_lock(&lockres->spinlock); - unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres); - spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); - - if (!unused) - continue; purge_jiffies = lockres->last_used + msecs_to_jiffies(DLM_PURGE_INTERVAL_MS); @@ -273,15 +247,29 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, * in tail order, we can stop at the first * unpurgable resource -- anyone added after * him will have a greater last_used value */ + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); break; } + /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double + * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm + * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more + * refs on it. */ + unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres); + if (!unused || + (lockres->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)) { + mlog(0, "lockres %s:%.*s: is in use or " + "being remastered, used %d, state %d\n", + dlm->name, lockres->lockname.len, + lockres->lockname.name, !unused, lockres->state); + list_move_tail(&dlm->purge_list, &lockres->purge); + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); + continue; + } + dlm_lockres_get(lockres); - /* This may drop and reacquire the dlm spinlock if it - * has to do migration. */ - if (dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres)) - BUG(); + dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres); dlm_lockres_put(lockres); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8a2e70c40ff58f82dde67770e6623ca45f0cb0c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tao Ma Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:56:45 +0800 Subject: ocfs2: Count more refcount records in file system fragmentation. The refcount record calculation in ocfs2_calc_refcount_meta_credits is too optimistic that we can always allocate contiguous clusters and handle an already existed refcount rec as a whole. Actually because of file system fragmentation, we may have the chance to split a refcount record into 3 parts during the transaction. So consider the worst case in record calculation. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tao Ma Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c index 3ac5aa733e9c..73a11ccfd4c2 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c @@ -2436,16 +2436,26 @@ static int ocfs2_calc_refcount_meta_credits(struct super_block *sb, len = min((u64)cpos + clusters, le64_to_cpu(rec.r_cpos) + le32_to_cpu(rec.r_clusters)) - cpos; /* - * If the refcount rec already exist, cool. We just need - * to check whether there is a split. Otherwise we just need - * to increase the refcount. - * If we will insert one, increases recs_add. - * * We record all the records which will be inserted to the * same refcount block, so that we can tell exactly whether * we need a new refcount block or not. + * + * If we will insert a new one, this is easy and only happens + * during adding refcounted flag to the extent, so we don't + * have a chance of spliting. We just need one record. + * + * If the refcount rec already exists, that would be a little + * complicated. we may have to: + * 1) split at the beginning if the start pos isn't aligned. + * we need 1 more record in this case. + * 2) split int the end if the end pos isn't aligned. + * we need 1 more record in this case. + * 3) split in the middle because of file system fragmentation. + * we need 2 more records in this case(we can't detect this + * beforehand, so always think of the worst case). */ if (rec.r_refcount) { + recs_add += 2; /* Check whether we need a split at the beginning. */ if (cpos == start_cpos && cpos != le64_to_cpu(rec.r_cpos)) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 845b6cf34150100deb5f58c8a37a372b111f2918 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiaju Zhang Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:21:06 +0800 Subject: Fix the nested PR lock calling issue in ACL Hi, Thanks a lot for all the review and comments so far;) I'd like to send the improved (V4) version of this patch. This patch fixes a deadlock in OCFS2 ACL. We found this bug in OCFS2 and Samba integration using scenario, the symptom is several smbd processes will be hung under heavy workload. Finally we found out it is the nested PR lock calling that leads to this deadlock: node1 node2 gr PR | V PR(EX)---> BAST:OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED | V rq PR | V wait=1 After requesting the 2nd PR lock, the process "smbd" went into D state. It can only be woken up when the 1st PR lock's RO holder equals zero. There should be an ocfs2_inode_unlock in the calling path later on, which can decrement the RO holder. But since it has been in uninterruptible sleep, the unlock function has no chance to be called. The related stack trace is: smbd D ffff8800013d0600 0 9522 5608 0x00000000 ffff88002ca7fb18 0000000000000282 ffff88002f964500 ffff88002ca7fa98 ffff8800013d0600 ffff88002ca7fae0 ffff88002f964340 ffff88002f964340 ffff88002ca7ffd8 ffff88002ca7ffd8 ffff88002f964340 ffff88002f964340 Call Trace: [] schedule_timeout+0x175/0x210 [] wait_for_common+0xf0/0x210 [] __ocfs2_cluster_lock+0x3b9/0xa90 [ocfs2] [] ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested+0x255/0xdb0 [ocfs2] [] ocfs2_get_acl+0x69/0x120 [ocfs2] [] ocfs2_check_acl+0x28/0x80 [ocfs2] [] acl_permission_check+0x57/0xb0 [] generic_permission+0x1d/0xc0 [] ocfs2_permission+0x10a/0x1d0 [ocfs2] [] inode_permission+0x45/0x100 [] sys_chdir+0x53/0x90 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<00007f34a4ef6927>] 0x7f34a4ef6927 For details, please see: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614332 and http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1278 Signed-off-by: Jiaju Zhang Acked-by: Mark Fasheh Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/acl.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c index 5a2177833210..a76e0aa5cd3f 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c @@ -290,12 +290,30 @@ static int ocfs2_set_acl(handle_t *handle, int ocfs2_check_acl(struct inode *inode, int mask) { - struct posix_acl *acl = ocfs2_get_acl(inode, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS); + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); + struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL; + struct posix_acl *acl; + int ret = -EAGAIN; - if (IS_ERR(acl)) + if (!(osb->s_mount_opt & OCFS2_MOUNT_POSIX_ACL)) + return ret; + + ret = ocfs2_read_inode_block(inode, &di_bh); + if (ret < 0) { + mlog_errno(ret); + return ret; + } + + acl = ocfs2_get_acl_nolock(inode, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS, di_bh); + + brelse(di_bh); + + if (IS_ERR(acl)) { + mlog_errno(PTR_ERR(acl)); return PTR_ERR(acl); + } if (acl) { - int ret = posix_acl_permission(inode, acl, mask); + ret = posix_acl_permission(inode, acl, mask); posix_acl_release(acl); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From a524812b7eaa7783d7811198921100f079034e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wengang Wang Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:14:44 +0800 Subject: ocfs2/dlm: avoid incorrect bit set in refmap on recovery master In the following situation, there remains an incorrect bit in refmap on the recovery master. Finally the recovery master will fail at purging the lockres due to the incorrect bit in refmap. 1) node A has no interest on lockres A any longer, so it is purging it. 2) the owner of lockres A is node B, so node A is sending de-ref message to node B. 3) at this time, node B crashed. node C becomes the recovery master. it recovers lockres A(because the master is the dead node B). 4) node A migrated lockres A to node C with a refbit there. 5) node A failed to send de-ref message to node B because it crashed. The failure is ignored. no other action is done for lockres A any more. For mormal, re-send the deref message to it to recovery master can fix it. Well, ignoring the failure of deref to the original master and not recovering the lockres to recovery master has the same effect. And the later is simpler. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang Acked-by: Srinivas Eeda Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c index 9dfaac73b36d..aaaffbcbe916 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c @@ -1997,6 +1997,8 @@ void dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct list_head *queue; struct dlm_lock *lock, *next; + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock); + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING; if (!list_empty(&res->recovering)) { mlog(0, @@ -2326,19 +2328,15 @@ static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node) /* zero the lvb if necessary */ dlm_revalidate_lvb(dlm, res, dead_node); if (res->owner == dead_node) { - if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF) - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: owned by " - "dead node %u, this node was " - "dropping its ref when it died. " - "continue, dropping the flag.\n", - dlm->name, res->lockname.len, - res->lockname.name, dead_node); - - /* the wake_up for this will happen when the - * RECOVERING flag is dropped later */ - res->state &= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; + if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF) { + mlog(ML_NOTICE, "Ignore %.*s for " + "recovery as it is being freed\n", + res->lockname.len, + res->lockname.name); + } else + dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(dlm, + res); - dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(dlm, res); } else if (res->owner == dlm->node_num) { dlm_free_dead_locks(dlm, res, dead_node); __dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c index dd78ca3f360f..2211acf33d9b 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c @@ -92,19 +92,27 @@ int __dlm_lockres_has_locks(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) * truly ready to be freed. */ int __dlm_lockres_unused(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) { - if (!__dlm_lockres_has_locks(res) && - (list_empty(&res->dirty) && !(res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DIRTY))) { - /* try not to scan the bitmap unless the first two - * conditions are already true */ - int bit = find_next_bit(res->refmap, O2NM_MAX_NODES, 0); - if (bit >= O2NM_MAX_NODES) { - /* since the bit for dlm->node_num is not - * set, inflight_locks better be zero */ - BUG_ON(res->inflight_locks != 0); - return 1; - } - } - return 0; + int bit; + + if (__dlm_lockres_has_locks(res)) + return 0; + + if (!list_empty(&res->dirty) || res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DIRTY) + return 0; + + if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING) + return 0; + + bit = find_next_bit(res->refmap, O2NM_MAX_NODES, 0); + if (bit < O2NM_MAX_NODES) + return 0; + + /* + * since the bit for dlm->node_num is not set, inflight_locks better + * be zero + */ + BUG_ON(res->inflight_locks != 0); + return 1; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From b11f1f1ab73fd358b1b734a9427744802202ba68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wengang Wang Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:18:00 +0800 Subject: ocfs2/dlm: remove potential deadlock -V3 When we need to take both dlm_domain_lock and dlm->spinlock, we should take them in order of: dlm_domain_lock then dlm->spinlock. There is pathes disobey this order. That is calling dlm_lockres_put() with dlm->spinlock held in dlm_run_purge_list. dlm_lockres_put() calls dlm_put() at the ref and dlm_put() locks on dlm_domain_lock. Fix: Don't grab/put the dlm when the initialising/releasing lockres. That grab is not required because we don't call dlm_unregister_domain() based on refcount. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c index 6d098b89d46e..ffb4c68dafa4 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c @@ -511,8 +511,6 @@ static void dlm_lockres_release(struct kref *kref) atomic_dec(&dlm->res_cur_count); - dlm_put(dlm); - if (!hlist_unhashed(&res->hash_node) || !list_empty(&res->granted) || !list_empty(&res->converting) || @@ -585,8 +583,6 @@ static void dlm_init_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, res->migration_pending = 0; res->inflight_locks = 0; - /* put in dlm_lockres_release */ - dlm_grab(dlm); res->dlm = dlm; kref_init(&res->refs); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 415cf32c9cdfcc60f34d0ac17f29634e941ba7d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tristan Ye Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:00:26 +0800 Subject: O2net: Disallow o2net accept connection request from itself. Currently, o2net_accept_one() is allowed to accept a connection from listening node itself, such a fake connection will not be successfully established due to no handshake detected afterwards, and later end up with triggering connecting worker in a loop. We're going to fix this by treating such connection request as 'invalid', since we've got no chance of requesting connection from a node to itself in a OCFS2 cluster. The fix doesn't hurt user's scan for o2net-listener, it always gets a successful connection from userpace. Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye Acked-by: Sunil Mushran Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c index aa75ca3f78da..1361997cf205 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c @@ -1759,6 +1759,7 @@ static int o2net_accept_one(struct socket *sock) struct sockaddr_in sin; struct socket *new_sock = NULL; struct o2nm_node *node = NULL; + struct o2nm_node *local_node = NULL; struct o2net_sock_container *sc = NULL; struct o2net_node *nn; @@ -1796,11 +1797,15 @@ static int o2net_accept_one(struct socket *sock) goto out; } - if (o2nm_this_node() > node->nd_num) { - mlog(ML_NOTICE, "unexpected connect attempted from a lower " - "numbered node '%s' at " "%pI4:%d with num %u\n", - node->nd_name, &sin.sin_addr.s_addr, - ntohs(sin.sin_port), node->nd_num); + if (o2nm_this_node() >= node->nd_num) { + local_node = o2nm_get_node_by_num(o2nm_this_node()); + mlog(ML_NOTICE, "unexpected connect attempt seen at node '%s' (" + "%u, %pI4:%d) from node '%s' (%u, %pI4:%d)\n", + local_node->nd_name, local_node->nd_num, + &(local_node->nd_ipv4_address), + ntohs(local_node->nd_ipv4_port), + node->nd_name, node->nd_num, &sin.sin_addr.s_addr, + ntohs(sin.sin_port)); ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } @@ -1857,6 +1862,8 @@ out: sock_release(new_sock); if (node) o2nm_node_put(node); + if (local_node) + o2nm_node_put(local_node); if (sc) sc_put(sc); return ret; -- cgit v1.2.3