From db66d756c74acb886c51f11b501c2fe622018a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masanari Iida Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 01:59:15 +0900 Subject: sched/docbook: Fix 'make htmldocs' warnings caused by missing description When 'flags' argument to sched_{set,get}attr() syscalls were added in: 6d35ab48090b ("sched: Add 'flags' argument to sched_{set,get}attr() syscalls") no description for 'flags' was added. It causes the following warnings on "make htmldocs": Warning(/kernel/sched/core.c:3645): No description found for parameter 'flags' Warning(/kernel/sched/core.c:3789): No description found for parameter 'flags' Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida Cc: peterz@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397753955-2914-1-git-send-email-standby24x7@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 268a45ea238c..9fe2190005cb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3639,6 +3639,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_setparam, pid_t, pid, struct sched_param __user *, param) * sys_sched_setattr - same as above, but with extended sched_attr * @pid: the pid in question. * @uattr: structure containing the extended parameters. + * @flags: for future extension. */ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, flags) @@ -3783,6 +3784,7 @@ err_size: * @pid: the pid in question. * @uattr: structure containing the extended parameters. * @size: sizeof(attr) for fwd/bwd comp. + * @flags: for future extension. */ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, size, unsigned int, flags) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 2d513868e2a33e1d5315490ef4c861ee65babd65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 23:26:24 +0200 Subject: sched: Sanitize irq accounting madness Russell reported, that irqtime_account_idle_ticks() takes ages due to: for (i = 0; i < ticks; i++) irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq); It's sad, that this code was written way _AFTER_ the NOHZ idle functionality was available. I charge myself guitly for not paying attention when that crap got merged with commit abb74cefa ("sched: Export ns irqtimes through /proc/stat") So instead of looping nr_ticks times just apply the whole thing at once. As a side note: The whole cputime_t vs. u64 business in that context wants to be cleaned up as well. There is no point in having all these back and forth conversions. Lets standardise on u64 nsec for all kernel internal accounting and be done with it. Everything else does not make sense at all for fine grained accounting. Frederic, can you please take care of that? Reported-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: Shaun Ruffell Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1405022307000.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/cputime.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c index a95097cb4591..72fdf06ef865 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c @@ -332,50 +332,50 @@ out: * softirq as those do not count in task exec_runtime any more. */ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick, - struct rq *rq) + struct rq *rq, int ticks) { - cputime_t one_jiffy_scaled = cputime_to_scaled(cputime_one_jiffy); + cputime_t scaled = cputime_to_scaled(cputime_one_jiffy); + u64 cputime = (__force u64) cputime_one_jiffy; u64 *cpustat = kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat; if (steal_account_process_tick()) return; + cputime *= ticks; + scaled *= ticks; + if (irqtime_account_hi_update()) { - cpustat[CPUTIME_IRQ] += (__force u64) cputime_one_jiffy; + cpustat[CPUTIME_IRQ] += cputime; } else if (irqtime_account_si_update()) { - cpustat[CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ] += (__force u64) cputime_one_jiffy; + cpustat[CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ] += cputime; } else if (this_cpu_ksoftirqd() == p) { /* * ksoftirqd time do not get accounted in cpu_softirq_time. * So, we have to handle it separately here. * Also, p->stime needs to be updated for ksoftirqd. */ - __account_system_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled, - CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ); + __account_system_time(p, cputime, scaled, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ); } else if (user_tick) { - account_user_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled); + account_user_time(p, cputime, scaled); } else if (p == rq->idle) { - account_idle_time(cputime_one_jiffy); + account_idle_time(cputime); } else if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) { /* System time or guest time */ - account_guest_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled); + account_guest_time(p, cputime, scaled); } else { - __account_system_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled, - CPUTIME_SYSTEM); + __account_system_time(p, cputime, scaled, CPUTIME_SYSTEM); } } static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) { - int i; struct rq *rq = this_rq(); - for (i = 0; i < ticks; i++) - irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq); + irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq, ticks); } #else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */ static inline void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) {} static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick, - struct rq *rq) {} + struct rq *rq, int nr_ticks) {} #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */ /* @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick) return; if (sched_clock_irqtime) { - irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, rq); + irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, rq, 1); return; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5bfd126e80dca70431aef8fdbc1cf14535f3c338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juri Lelli Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:49:04 +0200 Subject: sched/deadline: Fix sched_yield() behavior yield_task_dl() is broken: o it forces current to be throttled setting its runtime to zero; o it sets current's dl_se->dl_new to one, expecting that dl_task_timer() will queue it back with proper parameters at replenish time. Unfortunately, dl_task_timer() has this check at the very beginning: if (!dl_task(p) || dl_se->dl_new) goto unlock; So, it just bails out and the task is never replenished. It actually yielded forever. To fix this, introduce a new flag indicating that the task properly yielded the CPU before its current runtime expired. While this is a little overdoing at the moment, the flag would be useful in the future to discriminate between "good" jobs (of which remaining runtime could be reclaimed, i.e. recycled) and "bad" jobs (for which dl_throttled task has been set) that needed to be stopped. Reported-by: yjay.kim Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140429103953.e68eba1b2ac3309214e3dc5a@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++-- kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + kernel/sched/deadline.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 25f54c79f757..2a4298fb0d85 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1153,9 +1153,12 @@ struct sched_dl_entity { * * @dl_boosted tells if we are boosted due to DI. If so we are * outside bandwidth enforcement mechanism (but only until we - * exit the critical section). + * exit the critical section); + * + * @dl_yielded tells if task gave up the cpu before consuming + * all its available runtime during the last job. */ - int dl_throttled, dl_new, dl_boosted; + int dl_throttled, dl_new, dl_boosted, dl_yielded; /* * Bandwidth enforcement timer. Each -deadline task has its diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 9fe2190005cb..e62c65a12d5b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3124,6 +3124,7 @@ __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime); dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; dl_se->dl_new = 1; + dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; } static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p, diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index b08095786cb8..800e99b99075 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) sched_clock_tick(); update_rq_clock(rq); dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; + dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; if (p->on_rq) { enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); if (task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr)) @@ -893,10 +894,10 @@ static void yield_task_dl(struct rq *rq) * We make the task go to sleep until its current deadline by * forcing its runtime to zero. This way, update_curr_dl() stops * it and the bandwidth timer will wake it up and will give it - * new scheduling parameters (thanks to dl_new=1). + * new scheduling parameters (thanks to dl_yielded=1). */ if (p->dl.runtime > 0) { - rq->curr->dl.dl_new = 1; + rq->curr->dl.dl_yielded = 1; p->dl.runtime = 0; } update_curr_dl(rq); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6a7cd273dc4bc3246f37ebe874754a54ccb29141 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Li Zefan Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:05:02 +0800 Subject: sched/deadline: Fix memory leak Free cpudl->free_cpus allocated in cpudl_init(). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan Acked-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: # 3.14+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/534F36CE.2000409@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c index 5b9bb42b2d47..ab001b5d5048 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c @@ -210,7 +210,5 @@ int cpudl_init(struct cpudl *cp) */ void cpudl_cleanup(struct cpudl *cp) { - /* - * nothing to do for the moment - */ + free_cpumask_var(cp->free_cpus); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6227cb00cc120f9a43ce8313bb0475ddabcb7d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:34:53 -0400 Subject: sched: Use CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES instead of MAX_RT_PRIO in cpupri check The check at the beginning of cpupri_find() makes sure that the task_pri variable does not exceed the cp->pri_to_cpu array length. But that length is CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES not MAX_RT_PRIO, where it will miss the last two priorities in that array. As task_pri is computed from convert_prio() which should never be bigger than CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES, if the check should cause a panic if it is hit. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397015410.5212.13.camel@marge.simpson.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/cpupri.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c index 8b836b376d91..3031bac8aa3e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, int idx = 0; int task_pri = convert_prio(p->prio); - if (task_pri >= MAX_RT_PRIO) - return 0; + BUG_ON(task_pri >= CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES); for (idx = 0; idx < task_pri; idx++) { struct cpupri_vec *vec = &cp->pri_to_cpu[idx]; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6ccdc84b81a0a6c09a7f0427761d2f8cecfc2218 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:00:47 +0200 Subject: sched: Skip double execution of pick_next_task_fair() Tim wrote: "The current code will call pick_next_task_fair a second time in the slow path if we did not pull any task in our first try. This is really unnecessary as we already know no task can be pulled and it doubles the delay for the cpu to enter idle. We instrumented some network workloads and that saw that pick_next_task_fair is frequently called twice before a cpu enters idle. The call to pick_next_task_fair can add non trivial latency as it calls load_balance which runs find_busiest_group on an hierarchy of sched domains spanning the cpus for a large system. For some 4 socket systems, we saw almost 0.25 msec spent per call of pick_next_task_fair before a cpu can be idled." Optimize the second call away for the common case and document the dependency. Reported-by: Tim Chen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Len Brown Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140424100047.GP11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index e62c65a12d5b..28921ec91b3d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2592,8 +2592,14 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) if (likely(prev->sched_class == class && rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) { p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev); - if (likely(p && p != RETRY_TASK)) - return p; + if (unlikely(p == RETRY_TASK)) + goto again; + + /* assumes fair_sched_class->next == idle_sched_class */ + if (unlikely(!p)) + p = idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev); + + return p; } again: -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0e5b5337f0da073e1f17aec3c322ea7826975d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Low Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:45:54 -0700 Subject: sched: Fix updating rq->max_idle_balance_cost and rq->next_balance in idle_balance() The following commit: e5fc66119ec9 ("sched: Fix race in idle_balance()") can potentially cause rq->max_idle_balance_cost to not be updated, even when load_balance(NEWLY_IDLE) is attempted and the per-sd max cost value is updated. Preeti noticed a similar issue with updating rq->next_balance. In this patch, we fix this by making sure we still check/update those values even if a task gets enqueued while browsing the domains. Signed-off-by: Jason Low Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org Cc: efault@gmx.de Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398725155-7591-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 7570dd969c28..0fdb96de81a5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6653,6 +6653,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; idle_enter_fair(this_rq); + /* * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time. @@ -6705,14 +6706,16 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); + if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost) + this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost; + /* - * While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock. - * A task could have be enqueued in the meantime + * While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock, a task could + * have been enqueued in the meantime. Since we're not going idle, + * pretend we pulled a task. */ - if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task) { + if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task) pulled_task = 1; - goto out; - } if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) { /* @@ -6722,9 +6725,6 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) this_rq->next_balance = next_balance; } - if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost) - this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost; - out: /* Is there a task of a high priority class? */ if (this_rq->nr_running != this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && -- cgit v1.2.3 From 2b4cfe64dee0d84506b951d81bf55d9891744d25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Low Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:30:34 -0700 Subject: sched/numa: Initialize newidle balance stats in sd_numa_init() Also initialize the per-sd variables for newidle load balancing in sd_numa_init(). Signed-off-by: Jason Low Acked-by: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: efault@gmx.de Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398303035-18255-3-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 28921ec91b3d..13584f1cccfc 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6026,6 +6026,8 @@ sd_numa_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu) , .last_balance = jiffies, .balance_interval = sd_weight, + .max_newidle_lb_cost = 0, + .next_decay_max_lb_cost = jiffies, }; SD_INIT_NAME(sd, NUMA); sd->private = &tl->data; -- cgit v1.2.3