From 36903abedfe8d419e90ce349b2b4ce6dc2883e17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:15:57 +0100 Subject: x86: remove __range_not_ok() The __range_not_ok() helper is an x86 (and sparc64) specific interface that does roughly the same thing as __access_ok(), but with different calling conventions. Change this to use the normal interface in order for consistency as we clean up all access_ok() implementations. This changes the limit from TASK_SIZE to TASK_SIZE_MAX, which Al points out is the right thing do do here anyway. The callers have to use __access_ok() instead of the normal access_ok() though, because on x86 that contains a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() check that cannot be used inside of NMI context while tracing. The check in copy_code() is not needed any more, because this one is already done by copy_from_user_nmi(). Suggested-by: Al Viro Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YgsUKcXGR7r4nINj@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/lib') diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c index c3e8a62ca561..ad0139d25401 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ copy_from_user_nmi(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { unsigned long ret; - if (__range_not_ok(from, n, TASK_SIZE)) + if (!__access_ok(from, n)) return n; if (!nmi_uaccess_okay()) -- cgit v1.2.3