From cb1f65c1e1424a4b5e4a86da8aa3b8fd8459c8ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael J. Wysocki Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:35:22 +0100 Subject: PM: s2idle: ACPI: Fix wakeup interrupts handling After commit e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE") wakeup interrupts occurring immediately after the one discarded by acpi_s2idle_wake() may be missed. Moreover, if the SCI triggers again immediately after the rearming in acpi_s2idle_wake(), that wakeup may be missed too. The problem is that pm_system_irq_wakeup() only calls pm_system_wakeup() when pm_wakeup_irq is 0, but that's not the case any more after the interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to run until pm_wakeup_irq is cleared by the pm_wakeup_clear() call in s2idle_loop(). However, there may be wakeup interrupts occurring in that time frame and if that happens, they will be missed. To address that issue first move the clearing of pm_wakeup_irq to the point at which it is known that the interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to tun will be discarded, before rearming the SCI for wakeup. Moreover, because that only reduces the size of the time window in which the issue may manifest itself, allow pm_system_irq_wakeup() to register two second wakeup interrupts in a row and, when discarding the first one, replace it with the second one. [Of course, this assumes that only one wakeup interrupt can be discarded in one go, but currently that is the case and I am not aware of any plans to change that.] Fixes: e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE") Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/base') diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c index 99bda0da23a8..8666590201c9 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ suspend_state_t pm_suspend_target_state; bool events_check_enabled __read_mostly; /* First wakeup IRQ seen by the kernel in the last cycle. */ -unsigned int pm_wakeup_irq __read_mostly; +static unsigned int wakeup_irq[2] __read_mostly; +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(wakeup_irq_lock); /* If greater than 0 and the system is suspending, terminate the suspend. */ static atomic_t pm_abort_suspend __read_mostly; @@ -942,19 +943,45 @@ void pm_system_cancel_wakeup(void) atomic_dec_if_positive(&pm_abort_suspend); } -void pm_wakeup_clear(bool reset) +void pm_wakeup_clear(unsigned int irq_number) { - pm_wakeup_irq = 0; - if (reset) + raw_spin_lock_irq(&wakeup_irq_lock); + + if (irq_number && wakeup_irq[0] == irq_number) + wakeup_irq[0] = wakeup_irq[1]; + else + wakeup_irq[0] = 0; + + wakeup_irq[1] = 0; + + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wakeup_irq_lock); + + if (!irq_number) atomic_set(&pm_abort_suspend, 0); } void pm_system_irq_wakeup(unsigned int irq_number) { - if (pm_wakeup_irq == 0) { - pm_wakeup_irq = irq_number; + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&wakeup_irq_lock, flags); + + if (wakeup_irq[0] == 0) + wakeup_irq[0] = irq_number; + else if (wakeup_irq[1] == 0) + wakeup_irq[1] = irq_number; + else + irq_number = 0; + + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wakeup_irq_lock, flags); + + if (irq_number) pm_system_wakeup(); - } +} + +unsigned int pm_wakeup_irq(void) +{ + return wakeup_irq[0]; } /** -- cgit v1.2.3