From 25cb5b7ac6a7f7943e22a6831b74a6aa964d2a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:05:47 -0700 Subject: bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion and the example in the former is confusing. Some developers think that it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working. Change example to explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Fixes: 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros") Depends-on: 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from to a new file") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Reported-by: Jan Dąbroś Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/bitfield.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/bitfield.h b/include/linux/bitfield.h index 6093fa6db260..c9be1657f03d 100644 --- a/include/linux/bitfield.h +++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ * * Example: * + * #include + * #include + * * #define REG_FIELD_A GENMASK(6, 0) * #define REG_FIELD_B BIT(7) * #define REG_FIELD_C GENMASK(15, 8) -- cgit v1.2.3