From 55adc1d05dca9e949cdf46c747cb1e91c0e9143d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:40:30 -0700 Subject: mm: add private lock to serialize memory hotplug operations Commit bfc8c90139eb ("mem-hotplug: implement get/put_online_mems") introduced new functions get/put_online_mems() and mem_hotplug_begin/end() in order to allow similar semantics for memory hotplug like for cpu hotplug. The corresponding functions for cpu hotplug are get/put_online_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_begin/done() for cpu hotplug. The commit however missed to introduce functions that would serialize memory hotplug operations like they are done for cpu hotplug with cpu_maps_update_begin/done(). This basically leaves mem_hotplug.active_writer unprotected and allows concurrent writers to modify it, which may lead to problems as outlined by commit f931ab479dd2 ("mm: fix devm_memremap_pages crash, use mem_hotplug_{begin, done}"). That commit was extended again with commit b5d24fda9c3d ("mm, devm_memremap_pages: hold device_hotplug lock over mem_hotplug_{begin, done}") which serializes memory hotplug operations for some call sites by using the device_hotplug lock. In addition with commit 3fc21924100b ("mm: validate device_hotplug is held for memory hotplug") a sanity check was added to mem_hotplug_begin() to verify that the device_hotplug lock is held. This in turn triggers the following warning on s390: WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 1 at drivers/base/core.c:643 assert_held_device_hotplug+0x4a/0x58 Call Trace: assert_held_device_hotplug+0x40/0x58) mem_hotplug_begin+0x34/0xc8 add_memory_resource+0x7e/0x1f8 add_memory+0xda/0x130 add_memory_merged+0x15c/0x178 sclp_detect_standby_memory+0x2ae/0x2f8 do_one_initcall+0xa2/0x150 kernel_init_freeable+0x228/0x2d8 kernel_init+0x2a/0x140 kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc One possible fix would be to add more lock_device_hotplug() and unlock_device_hotplug() calls around each call site of mem_hotplug_begin/end(). But that would give the device_hotplug lock additional semantics it better should not have (serialize memory hotplug operations). Instead add a new memory_add_remove_lock which has the similar semantics like cpu_add_remove_lock for cpu hotplug. To keep things hopefully a bit easier the lock will be locked and unlocked within the mem_hotplug_begin/end() functions. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170314125226.16779-2-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Reported-by: Sebastian Ott Acked-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Ben Hutchings Cc: Gerald Schaefer Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index 295479b792ec..6fa7208bcd56 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -125,9 +125,12 @@ void put_online_mems(void) } +/* Serializes write accesses to mem_hotplug.active_writer. */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_add_remove_lock); + void mem_hotplug_begin(void) { - assert_held_device_hotplug(); + mutex_lock(&memory_add_remove_lock); mem_hotplug.active_writer = current; @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ void mem_hotplug_done(void) mem_hotplug.active_writer = NULL; mutex_unlock(&mem_hotplug.lock); memhp_lock_release(); + mutex_unlock(&memory_add_remove_lock); } /* add this memory to iomem resource */ -- cgit v1.2.3