From f249fb783092471a4808e5fc5bda071d2724810d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rémi Denis-Courmont Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:47:04 +0000 Subject: Fix error return for setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPING) I guess it should be -EINVAL rather than EINVAL. I have not checked when the bug came in. Perhaps a candidate for -stable? Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/sock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index d9eec153d531..bbb25be7ddfe 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ set_rcvbuf: case SO_TIMESTAMPING: if (val & ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK) { - ret = EINVAL; + ret = -EINVAL; break; } sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE, -- cgit v1.2.3