aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds2023-04-23 09:56:20 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman2023-04-26 14:28:43 +0200
commita93c20f5832221c2bf5f80199c4eaebc0ba28e16 (patch)
tree3a8d8e7e2bde24e04a928560c8caa3f4fd057d20
parenta09b9383b7495681c9bae41752ee456cf42e41f0 (diff)
gcc: disable '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-13 too
commit 0da6e5fd6c3726723e275603426e09178940dace upstream. We started disabling '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-12 originally on s390, because it resulted in some warnings that weren't realistically fixable (commit 8b202ee21839: "s390: disable -Warray-bounds"). That s390-specific issue was then found to be less common elsewhere, but generic (see f0be87c42cbd: "gcc-12: disable '-Warray-bounds' universally for now"), and then later expanded the version check was expanded to gcc-11 (5a41237ad1d4: "gcc: disable -Warray-bounds for gcc-11 too"). And it turns out that I was much too optimistic in thinking that it's all going to go away, and here we are with gcc-13 showing all the same issues. So instead of expanding this one version at a time, let's just disable it for gcc-11+, and put an end limit to it only when we actually find a solution. Yes, I'm sure some of this is because the kernel just does odd things (like our "container_of()" use, but also knowingly playing games with things like linker tables and array layouts). And yes, some of the warnings are likely signs of real bugs, but when there are hundreds of false positives, that doesn't really help. Oh well. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--init/Kconfig10
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 0c214af99085..2028ed4d50f5 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -892,18 +892,14 @@ config CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH
default "-Wimplicit-fallthrough=5" if CC_IS_GCC && $(cc-option,-Wimplicit-fallthrough=5)
default "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" if CC_IS_CLANG && $(cc-option,-Wunreachable-code-fallthrough)
-# Currently, disable gcc-11,12 array-bounds globally.
-# We may want to target only particular configurations some day.
+# Currently, disable gcc-11+ array-bounds globally.
+# It's still broken in gcc-13, so no upper bound yet.
config GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
def_bool y
-config GCC12_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
- def_bool y
-
config CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
bool
- default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 110000 && GCC_VERSION < 120000 && GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
- default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 120000 && GCC_VERSION < 130000 && GCC12_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
+ default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 110000 && GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
#
# For architectures that know their GCC __int128 support is sound