diff options
| author | Pierre Gondois | 2022-07-04 13:27:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Viresh Kumar | 2022-07-18 07:22:22 +0530 |
| commit | 68315f1a5f1333d8aa67bb7061b5a9da1134f474 (patch) | |
| tree | 5061858a9339db6517eb8123c3036572fb48b2f9 /drivers/cpufreq | |
| parent | f2b03dffa62e496df97b2b0d68fba2324c8d13c7 (diff) | |
cpufreq: Change order of online() CB and policy->cpus modification
From a state where all policy->related_cpus are offline, putting one
of the policy's CPU back online re-activates the policy by:
1. Calling cpufreq_driver->online()
2. Setting the CPU in policy->cpus
qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_online() makes use of policy->cpus. Thus 1. and 2.
should be inverted to avoid having a policy->cpus empty. The
qcom-cpufreq-hw is the only driver affected by this.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 2cad42774164..36043be16d8e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1350,15 +1350,15 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) } if (!new_policy && cpufreq_driver->online) { + /* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */ + cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus); + ret = cpufreq_driver->online(policy); if (ret) { pr_debug("%s: %d: initialization failed\n", __func__, __LINE__); goto out_exit_policy; } - - /* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */ - cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus); } else { cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu)); |