fscrypt: v2 encryption policy support

Add a new fscrypt policy version, "v2".  It has the following changes
from the original policy version, which we call "v1" (*):

- Master keys (the user-provided encryption keys) are only ever used as
  input to HKDF-SHA512.  This is more flexible and less error-prone, and
  it avoids the quirks and limitations of the AES-128-ECB based KDF.
  Three classes of cryptographically isolated subkeys are defined:

    - Per-file keys, like used in v1 policies except for the new KDF.

    - Per-mode keys.  These implement the semantics of the DIRECT_KEY
      flag, which for v1 policies made the master key be used directly.
      These are also planned to be used for inline encryption when
      support for it is added.

    - Key identifiers (see below).

- Each master key is identified by a 16-byte master_key_identifier,
  which is derived from the key itself using HKDF-SHA512.  This prevents
  users from associating the wrong key with an encrypted file or
  directory.  This was easily possible with v1 policies, which
  identified the key by an arbitrary 8-byte master_key_descriptor.

- The key must be provided in the filesystem-level keyring, not in a
  process-subscribed keyring.

The following UAPI additions are made:

- The existing ioctl FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can now be passed a
  fscrypt_policy_v2 to set a v2 encryption policy.  It's disambiguated
  from fscrypt_policy/fscrypt_policy_v1 by the version code prefix.

- A new ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX is added.  It allows
  getting the v1 or v2 encryption policy of an encrypted file or
  directory.  The existing FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl could not
  be used because it did not have a way for userspace to indicate which
  policy structure is expected.  The new ioctl includes a size field, so
  it is extensible to future fscrypt policy versions.

- The ioctls FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY, FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY,
  and FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS now support managing keys for v2
  encryption policies.  Such keys are kept logically separate from keys
  for v1 encryption policies, and are identified by 'identifier' rather
  than by 'descriptor'.  The 'identifier' need not be provided when
  adding a key, since the kernel will calculate it anyway.

This patch temporarily keeps adding/removing v2 policy keys behind the
same permission check done for adding/removing v1 policy keys:
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN).  However, the next patch will carefully take
advantage of the cryptographically secure master_key_identifier to allow
non-root users to add/remove v2 policy keys, thus providing a full
replacement for v1 policies.

(*) Actually, in the API fscrypt_policy::version is 0 while on-disk
    fscrypt_context::format is 1.  But I believe it makes the most sense
    to advance both to '2' to have them be in sync, and to consider the
    numbering to start at 1 except for the API quirk.

Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c b/fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c
index 631690bb6ed5..ad1a36c370c3 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c
@@ -189,12 +189,13 @@ find_or_insert_direct_key(struct fscrypt_direct_key *to_insert,
 	 */
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(hash_key) > FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE);
-	memcpy(&hash_key, ci->ci_master_key_descriptor, sizeof(hash_key));
+	memcpy(&hash_key, ci->ci_policy.v1.master_key_descriptor,
+	       sizeof(hash_key));
 
 	spin_lock(&fscrypt_direct_keys_lock);
 	hash_for_each_possible(fscrypt_direct_keys, dk, dk_node, hash_key) {
-		if (memcmp(ci->ci_master_key_descriptor, dk->dk_descriptor,
-			   FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE) != 0)
+		if (memcmp(ci->ci_policy.v1.master_key_descriptor,
+			   dk->dk_descriptor, FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE) != 0)
 			continue;
 		if (ci->ci_mode != dk->dk_mode)
 			continue;
@@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ fscrypt_get_direct_key(const struct fscrypt_info *ci, const u8 *raw_key)
 		dk->dk_ctfm = NULL;
 		goto err_free_dk;
 	}
-	memcpy(dk->dk_descriptor, ci->ci_master_key_descriptor,
+	memcpy(dk->dk_descriptor, ci->ci_policy.v1.master_key_descriptor,
 	       FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE);
 	memcpy(dk->dk_raw, raw_key, ci->ci_mode->keysize);
 
@@ -262,7 +263,8 @@ static int setup_v1_file_key_direct(struct fscrypt_info *ci,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (ci->ci_data_mode != ci->ci_filename_mode) {
+	if (ci->ci_policy.v1.contents_encryption_mode !=
+	    ci->ci_policy.v1.filenames_encryption_mode) {
 		fscrypt_warn(ci->ci_inode,
 			     "Direct key mode not allowed with different contents and filenames modes");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -308,7 +310,7 @@ out:
 
 int fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key(struct fscrypt_info *ci, const u8 *raw_master_key)
 {
-	if (ci->ci_flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY)
+	if (ci->ci_policy.v1.flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY)
 		return setup_v1_file_key_direct(ci, raw_master_key);
 	else
 		return setup_v1_file_key_derived(ci, raw_master_key);
@@ -321,11 +323,11 @@ int fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key_via_subscribed_keyrings(struct fscrypt_info *ci)
 	int err;
 
 	key = find_and_lock_process_key(FSCRYPT_KEY_DESC_PREFIX,
-					ci->ci_master_key_descriptor,
+					ci->ci_policy.v1.master_key_descriptor,
 					ci->ci_mode->keysize, &payload);
 	if (key == ERR_PTR(-ENOKEY) && ci->ci_inode->i_sb->s_cop->key_prefix) {
 		key = find_and_lock_process_key(ci->ci_inode->i_sb->s_cop->key_prefix,
-						ci->ci_master_key_descriptor,
+						ci->ci_policy.v1.master_key_descriptor,
 						ci->ci_mode->keysize, &payload);
 	}
 	if (IS_ERR(key))