diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner | 2021-07-29 13:01:59 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner | 2021-08-28 01:33:02 +0200 |
commit | b542e383d8c005f06a131e2b40d5889b812f19c6 (patch) | |
tree | 14a6c55f5366f44df978f27c4b8a92f0a30b0689 /fs/eventfd.c | |
parent | 366e7ad6ba5f4cb2ffd0b7316e404d6ee9c0f401 (diff) |
eventfd: Make signal recursion protection a task bit
The recursion protection for eventfd_signal() is based on a per CPU
variable and relies on the !RT semantics of spin_lock_irqsave() for
protecting this per CPU variable. On RT kernels spin_lock_irqsave() neither
disables preemption nor interrupts which allows the spin lock held section
to be preempted. If the preempting task invokes eventfd_signal() as well,
then the recursion warning triggers.
Paolo suggested to protect the per CPU variable with a local lock, but
that's heavyweight and actually not necessary. The goal of this protection
is to prevent the task stack from overflowing, which can be achieved with a
per task recursion protection as well.
Replace the per CPU variable with a per task bit similar to other recursion
protection bits like task_struct::in_page_owner. This works on both !RT and
RT kernels and removes as a side effect the extra per CPU storage.
No functional change for !RT kernels.
Reported-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wnp9idso.ffs@tglx
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/eventfd.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/eventfd.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c index e265b6dd4f34..3627dd7d25db 100644 --- a/fs/eventfd.c +++ b/fs/eventfd.c @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/uio.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count); - static DEFINE_IDA(eventfd_ida); struct eventfd_ctx { @@ -67,21 +65,21 @@ __u64 eventfd_signal(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u64 n) * Deadlock or stack overflow issues can happen if we recurse here * through waitqueue wakeup handlers. If the caller users potentially * nested waitqueues with custom wakeup handlers, then it should - * check eventfd_signal_count() before calling this function. If - * it returns true, the eventfd_signal() call should be deferred to a + * check eventfd_signal_allowed() before calling this function. If + * it returns false, the eventfd_signal() call should be deferred to a * safe context. */ - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count))) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->in_eventfd_signal)) return 0; spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags); - this_cpu_inc(eventfd_wake_count); + current->in_eventfd_signal = 1; if (ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count < n) n = ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count; ctx->count += n; if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wqh)) wake_up_locked_poll(&ctx->wqh, EPOLLIN); - this_cpu_dec(eventfd_wake_count); + current->in_eventfd_signal = 0; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags); return n; |