aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ramfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Foster2023-08-10 12:55:59 -0400
committerTheodore Ts'o2023-08-27 11:27:12 -0400
commit194505b55dd7899da114a4d47825204eefc0fff5 (patch)
tree0fb09dc7999b7eeccc303ab1e4314f5a94a5bd66 /fs/ramfs
parent68228da51c9a436872a4ef4b5a7692e29f7e5bc7 (diff)
ext4: drop dio overwrite only flag and associated warning
The commit referenced below opened up concurrent unaligned dio under shared locking for pure overwrites. In doing so, it enabled use of the IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY flag and added a warning on unexpected -EAGAIN returns as an extra precaution, since ext4 does not retry writes in such cases. The flag itself is advisory in this case since ext4 checks for unaligned I/Os and uses appropriate locking up front, rather than on a retry in response to -EAGAIN. As it turns out, the warning check is susceptible to false positives because there are scenarios where -EAGAIN can be expected from lower layers without necessarily having IOCB_NOWAIT set on the iocb. For example, one instance of the warning has been seen where io_uring sets IOCB_HIPRI, which in turn results in REQ_POLLED|REQ_NOWAIT on the bio. This results in -EAGAIN if the block layer is unable to allocate a request, etc. [Note that there is an outstanding patch to untangle REQ_POLLED and REQ_NOWAIT such that the latter relies on IOCB_NOWAIT, which would also address this instance of the warning.] Another instance of the warning has been reproduced by syzbot. A dio write is interrupted down in __get_user_pages_locked() waiting on the mm lock and returns -EAGAIN up the stack. If the iomap dio iteration layer has made no progress on the write to this point, -EAGAIN returns up to the filesystem and triggers the warning. This use of the overwrite flag in ext4 is precautionary and half-baked. I.e., ext4 doesn't actually implement overwrite checking in the iomap callbacks when the flag is set, so the only extra verification it provides are i_size checks in the generic iomap dio layer. Combined with the tendency for false positives, the added verification is not worth the extra trouble. Remove the flag, associated warning, and update the comments to document when concurrent unaligned dio writes are allowed and why said flag is not used. Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+5050ad0fb47527b1808a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Fixes: 310ee0902b8d ("ext4: allow concurrent unaligned dio overwrites") Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810165559.946222-1-bfoster@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ramfs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions