diff options
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 34 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 46 |
4 files changed, 55 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig index d13b5328ca10..b29d7cb38368 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ config PPC select ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB if PPC64 select ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API + select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE select ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP if PPC_BOOK3S_64 select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 8d7ee40e2748..efe14cf24bc6 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1168,14 +1168,14 @@ static void __reg_assign_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) * but must be positive otherwise set to worse case bounds * and refine later from tnum. */ - if (reg->s32_min_value > 0) - reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value; - else - reg->smin_value = 0; - if (reg->s32_max_value > 0) + if (reg->s32_min_value >= 0 && reg->s32_max_value >= 0) reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value; else reg->smax_value = U32_MAX; + if (reg->s32_min_value >= 0) + reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value; + else + reg->smin_value = 0; } static void __reg_combine_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) @@ -10428,22 +10428,13 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } #define SECURITY_PREFIX "security_" -static int check_attach_modify_return(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +static int check_attach_modify_return(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long addr) { - struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog; - unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) prog->aux->trampoline->func.addr; - - /* This is expected to be cleaned up in the future with the KRSI effort - * introducing the LSM_HOOK macro for cleaning up lsm_hooks.h. - */ if (within_error_injection_list(addr) || !strncmp(SECURITY_PREFIX, prog->aux->attach_func_name, sizeof(SECURITY_PREFIX) - 1)) return 0; - verbose(env, "fmod_ret attach_btf_id %u (%s) is not modifiable\n", - prog->aux->attach_btf_id, prog->aux->attach_func_name); - return -EINVAL; } @@ -10654,11 +10645,18 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) goto out; } } + + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) { + ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr); + if (ret) + verbose(env, "%s() is not modifiable\n", + prog->aux->attach_func_name); + } + + if (ret) + goto out; tr->func.addr = (void *)addr; prog->aux->trampoline = tr; - - if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) - ret = check_attach_modify_return(env); out: mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex); if (ret) diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c index ed7a6060f73c..3889bd9aec46 100644 --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c @@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr) { bool unaligned_chunks = mr->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG; u32 chunk_size = mr->chunk_size, headroom = mr->headroom; + u64 npgs, addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len; unsigned int chunks, chunks_per_page; - u64 addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len; int err; if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) { @@ -372,6 +372,10 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr) if ((addr + size) < addr) return -EINVAL; + npgs = div_u64(size, PAGE_SIZE); + if (npgs > U32_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + chunks = (unsigned int)div_u64(size, chunk_size); if (chunks == 0) return -EINVAL; @@ -391,7 +395,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr) umem->size = size; umem->headroom = headroom; umem->chunk_size_nohr = chunk_size - headroom; - umem->npgs = size / PAGE_SIZE; + umem->npgs = (u32)npgs; umem->pgs = NULL; umem->user = NULL; umem->flags = mr->flags; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index a253a064e6e0..58f4aa593b1b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), /* r1 = [0x00, 0xff] */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffff80 >> 1), @@ -253,10 +253,6 @@ * [0xffff'ffff'0000'0080, 0xffff'ffff'ffff'ffff] */ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffff80 >> 1), - /* r1 = 0 or - * [0x00ff'ffff'ff00'0000, 0x00ff'ffff'ffff'ffff] - */ - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 8), /* error on OOB pointer computation */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), /* exit */ @@ -265,8 +261,10 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr = "value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", - .result = REJECT + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", + .result = REJECT, }, { "bounds check after truncation of boundary-crossing range (2)", @@ -276,7 +274,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), /* r1 = [0x00, 0xff] */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffff80 >> 1), @@ -293,10 +291,6 @@ * [0xffff'ffff'0000'0080, 0xffff'ffff'ffff'ffff] */ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffff80 >> 1), - /* r1 = 0 or - * [0x00ff'ffff'ff00'0000, 0x00ff'ffff'ffff'ffff] - */ - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 8), /* error on OOB pointer computation */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), /* exit */ @@ -305,8 +299,10 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr = "value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", - .result = REJECT + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", + .result = REJECT, }, { "bounds check after wrapping 32-bit addition", @@ -539,3 +535,25 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT }, +{ + "assigning 32bit bounds to 64bit for wA = 0, wB = wA", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_8, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_6, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, +}, |