aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-10-25btrfs: return -EUCLEAN for delayed tree ref with a ref count not equals to 1Filipe Manana
[ Upstream commit 1bf76df3fee56d6637718e267f7c34ed70d0c7dc ] When running a delayed tree reference, if we find a ref count different from 1, we return -EIO. This isn't an IO error, as it indicates either a bug in the delayed refs code or a memory corruption, so change the error code from -EIO to -EUCLEAN. Also tag the branch as 'unlikely' as this is not expected to ever happen, and change the error message to print the tree block's bytenr without the parenthesis (and there was a missing space between the 'block' word and the opening parenthesis), for consistency as that's the style we used everywhere else. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backrefQu Wenruo
[ Upstream commit 7f72f50547b7af4ddf985b07fc56600a4deba281 ] [BUG] Syzbot reported several warning triggered inside lookup_inline_extent_backref(). [CAUSE] As usual, the reproducer doesn't reliably trigger locally here, but at least we know the WARN_ON() is triggered when an inline backref can not be found, and it can only be triggered when @insert is true. (I.e. inserting a new inline backref, which means the backref should already exist) [ENHANCEMENT] After the WARN_ON(), dump all the parameters and the extent tree leaf to help debug. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d6f9ff86c1d804ba2bc6 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-19btrfs: zoned: do not zone finish data relocation block groupNaohiro Aota
commit 332581bde2a419d5f12a93a1cdc2856af649a3cc upstream. When multiple writes happen at once, we may need to sacrifice a currently active block group to be zone finished for a new allocation. We choose a block group with the least free space left, and zone finish it. To do the finishing, we need to send IOs for already allocated region and wait for them and on-going IOs. Otherwise, these IOs fail because the zone is already finished at the time the IO reach a device. However, if a block group dedicated to the data relocation is zone finished, there is a chance that finishing it before an ongoing write IO reaches the device. That is because there is timing gap between an allocation is done (block_group->reservations == 0, as pre-allocation is done) and an ordered extent is created when the relocation IO starts. Thus, if we finish the zone between them, we can fail the IOs. We cannot simply use "fs_info->data_reloc_bg == block_group->start" to avoid the zone finishing. Because, the data_reloc_bg may already switch to a new block group, while there are still ongoing write IOs to the old data_reloc_bg. So, this patch reworks the BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONED_DATA_RELOC bit to indicate there is a data relocation allocation and/or ongoing write to the block group. The bit is set on allocation and cleared in end_io function of the last IO for the currently allocated region. To change the timing of the bit setting also solves the issue that the bit being left even after there is no IO going on. With the current code, if the data_reloc_bg switches after the last IO to the current data_reloc_bg, the bit is set at this timing and there is no one clearing that bit. As a result, that block group is kept unallocatable for anything. Fixes: 343d8a30851c ("btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG") Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an errorJosef Bacik
commit 92fb94b69c6accf1e49fff699640fa0ce03dc910 upstream. We set cache_block_group_error if btrfs_cache_block_group() returns an error, this is because we could end up not finding space to allocate and mistakenly return -ENOSPC, and which could then abort the transaction with the incorrect errno, and in the case of ENOSPC result in a WARN_ON() that will trip up tests like generic/475. However there's the case where multiple threads can be racing, one thread gets the proper error, and the other thread doesn't actually call btrfs_cache_block_group(), it instead sees ->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR. Again the result is the same, we fail to allocate our space and return -ENOSPC. Instead we need to set cache_block_group_error to -EIO in this case to make sure that if we do not make our allocation we get the appropriate error returned back to the caller. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-01-24btrfs: always report error in run_one_delayed_ref()Qu Wenruo
[ Upstream commit 39f501d68ec1ed5cd5c66ac6ec2a7131c517bb92 ] Currently we have a btrfs_debug() for run_one_delayed_ref() failure, but if end users hit such problem, there will be no chance that btrfs_debug() is enabled. This can lead to very little useful info for debugging. This patch will: - Add extra info for error reporting Including: * logical bytenr * num_bytes * type * action * ref_mod - Replace the btrfs_debug() with btrfs_err() - Move the error reporting into run_one_delayed_ref() This is to avoid use-after-free, the @node can be freed in the caller. This error should only be triggered at most once. As if run_one_delayed_ref() failed, we trigger the error message, then causing the call chain to error out: btrfs_run_delayed_refs() `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs() `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head() `- run_one_delayed_ref() And we will abort the current transaction in btrfs_run_delayed_refs(). If we have to run delayed refs for the abort transaction, run_one_delayed_ref() will just cleanup the refs and do nothing, thus no new error messages would be output. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-10-24btrfs: fix tree mod log mishandling of reallocated nodesJosef Bacik
We have been seeing the following panic in production kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/tree-mod-log.c:677! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:tree_mod_log_rewind+0x1b4/0x200 RSP: 0000:ffffc9002c02f890 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffff8882b448c700 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 00000000000000a7 RDI: ffff88877d831c00 RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000000000000009f R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000100c40 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffff8886c26d6a00 R14: ffff88829f5424f8 R15: ffff88877d831a00 FS: 00007fee1d80c780(0000) GS:ffff8890400c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fee1963a020 CR3: 0000000434f33002 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: btrfs_get_old_root+0x12b/0x420 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x64/0x2f0 ? tree_mod_log_oldest_root+0x3d/0xf0 resolve_indirect_ref+0xfd/0x660 ? ulist_alloc+0x31/0x60 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x2c0 find_parent_nodes+0x97a/0x17e0 ? ulist_alloc+0x30/0x60 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x97/0x150 iterate_extent_inodes+0x154/0x370 ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x98/0xd0 ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240 btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0xd9/0x180 btrfs_ioctl+0xe2/0x2ec0 ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x3d/0x280 ? do_sys_openat2+0x6d/0x140 ? kretprobe_dispatcher+0x47/0x70 ? kretprobe_rethook_handler+0x38/0x50 ? rethook_trampoline_handler+0x82/0x140 ? arch_rethook_trampoline_callback+0x3b/0x50 ? kmem_cache_free+0xfb/0x270 ? do_sys_openat2+0xd5/0x140 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x71/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40 Which is this code in tree_mod_log_rewind() switch (tm->op) { case BTRFS_MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING: BUG_ON(tm->slot < n); This occurs because we replay the nodes in order that they happened, and when we do a REPLACE we will log a REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING for every slot, starting at 0. 'n' here is the number of items in this block, which in this case was 1, but we had 2 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations. The actual root cause of this was that we were replaying operations for a block that shouldn't have been replayed. Consider the following sequence of events 1. We have an already modified root, and we do a btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq(). 2. We begin removing items from this root, triggering KEY_REPLACE for it's child slots. 3. We remove one of the 2 children this root node points to, thus triggering the root node promotion of the remaining child, and freeing this node. 4. We modify a new root, and re-allocate the above node to the root node of this other root. The tree mod log looks something like this logical 0 op KEY_REPLACE (slot 1) seq 2 logical 0 op KEY_REMOVE (slot 1) seq 3 logical 0 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 0) seq 4 logical 4096 op LOG_ROOT_REPLACE (old logical 0) seq 5 logical 8192 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 1) seq 6 logical 8192 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 0) seq 7 logical 0 op LOG_ROOT_REPLACE (old logical 8192) seq 8 >From here the bug is triggered by the following steps 1. Call btrfs_get_old_root() on the new_root. 2. We call tree_mod_log_oldest_root(btrfs_root_node(new_root)), which is currently logical 0. 3. tree_mod_log_oldest_root() calls tree_mod_log_search_oldest(), which gives us the KEY_REPLACE seq 2, and since that's not a LOG_ROOT_REPLACE we incorrectly believe that we don't have an old root, because we expect that the most recent change should be a LOG_ROOT_REPLACE. 4. Back in tree_mod_log_oldest_root() we don't have a LOG_ROOT_REPLACE, so we don't set old_root, we simply use our existing extent buffer. 5. Since we're using our existing extent buffer (logical 0) we call tree_mod_log_search(0) in order to get the newest change to start the rewind from, which ends up being the LOG_ROOT_REPLACE at seq 8. 6. Again since we didn't find an old_root we simply clone logical 0 at it's current state. 7. We call tree_mod_log_rewind() with the cloned extent buffer. 8. Set n = btrfs_header_nritems(logical 0), which would be whatever the original nritems was when we COWed the original root, say for this example it's 2. 9. We start from the newest operation and work our way forward, so we see LOG_ROOT_REPLACE which we ignore. 10. Next we see KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING for slot 0, which triggers the BUG_ON(tm->slot < n), because it expects if we've done this we have a completely empty extent buffer to replay completely. The correct thing would be to find the first LOG_ROOT_REPLACE, and then get the old_root set to logical 8192. In fact making that change fixes this particular problem. However consider the much more complicated case. We have a child node in this tree and the above situation. In the above case we freed one of the child blocks at the seq 3 operation. If this block was also re-allocated and got new tree mod log operations we would have a different problem. btrfs_search_old_slot(orig root) would get down to the logical 0 root that still pointed at that node. However in btrfs_search_old_slot() we call tree_mod_log_rewind(buf) directly. This is not context aware enough to know which operations we should be replaying. If the block was re-allocated multiple times we may only want to replay a range of operations, and determining what that range is isn't possible to determine. We could maybe solve this by keeping track of which root the node belonged to at every tree mod log operation, and then passing this around to make sure we're only replaying operations that relate to the root we're trying to rewind. However there's a simpler way to solve this problem, simply disallow reallocations if we have currently running tree mod log users. We already do this for leaf's, so we're simply expanding this to nodes as well. This is a relatively uncommon occurrence, and the problem is complicated enough I'm worried that we will still have corner cases in the reallocation case. So fix this in the most straightforward way possible. Fixes: bd989ba359f2 ("Btrfs: add tree modification log functions") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.3+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-29btrfs: set generation before calling btrfs_clean_tree_block in ↵Tetsuo Handa
btrfs_init_new_buffer syzbot is reporting uninit-value in btrfs_clean_tree_block() [1], for commit bc877d285ca3dba2 ("btrfs: Deduplicate extent_buffer init code") missed that btrfs_set_header_generation() in btrfs_init_new_buffer() must not be moved to after clean_tree_block() because clean_tree_block() is calling btrfs_header_generation() since commit 55c69072d6bd5be1 ("Btrfs: Fix extent_buffer usage when nodesize != leafsize"). Since memzero_extent_buffer() will reset "struct btrfs_header" part, we can't move btrfs_set_header_generation() to before memzero_extent_buffer(). Just re-add btrfs_set_header_generation() before btrfs_clean_tree_block(). Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fba8e2116a12609b6c59 [1] Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+fba8e2116a12609b6c59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Fixes: bc877d285ca3dba2 ("btrfs: Deduplicate extent_buffer init code") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-29btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatibleJosef Bacik
If we have NOWAIT specified on our IOCB and we're writing into a PREALLOC or NOCOW extent then we need to be able to tell can_nocow_extent that we don't want to wait on any locks or metadata IO. Fix can_nocow_extent to allow for NOWAIT. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: speedup checking for extent sharedness during fiemapFilipe Manana
One of the most expensive tasks performed during fiemap is to check if an extent is shared. This task has two major steps: 1) Check if the data extent is shared. This implies checking the extent item in the extent tree, checking delayed references, etc. If we find the data extent is directly shared, we terminate immediately; 2) If the data extent is not directly shared (its extent item has a refcount of 1), then it may be shared if we have snapshots that share subtrees of the inode's subvolume b+tree. So we check if the leaf containing the file extent item is shared, then its parent node, then the parent node of the parent node, etc, until we reach the root node or we find one of them is shared - in which case we stop immediately. During fiemap we process the extents of a file from left to right, from file offset 0 to EOF. This means that we iterate b+tree leaves from left to right, and has the implication that we keep repeating that second step above several times for the same b+tree path of the inode's subvolume b+tree. For example, if we have two file extent items in leaf X, and the path to leaf X is A -> B -> C -> X, then when we try to determine if the data extent referenced by the first extent item is shared, we check if the data extent is shared - if it's not, then we check if leaf X is shared, if not, then we check if node C is shared, if not, then check if node B is shared, if not than check if node A is shared. When we move to the next file extent item, after determining the data extent is not shared, we repeat the checks for X, C, B and A - doing all the expensive searches in the extent tree, delayed refs, etc. If we have thousands of tile extents, then we keep repeating the sharedness checks for the same paths over and over. On a file that has no shared extents or only a small portion, it's easy to see that this scales terribly with the number of extents in the file and the sizes of the extent and subvolume b+trees. This change eliminates the repeated sharedness check on extent buffers by caching the results of the last path used. The results can be used as long as no snapshots were created since they were cached (for not shared extent buffers) or no roots were dropped since they were cached (for shared extent buffers). This greatly reduces the time spent by fiemap for files with thousands of extents and/or large extent and subvolume b+trees. Example performance test: $ cat fiemap-perf-test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT # 40G gives 327680 128K file extents (due to compression). xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 1M 0 40G" $MNT/foobar umount $MNT mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT start=$(date +%s%N) filefrag $MNT/foobar end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo "fiemap took $dur milliseconds (metadata not cached)" start=$(date +%s%N) filefrag $MNT/foobar end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo "fiemap took $dur milliseconds (metadata cached)" umount $MNT Before this patch: $ ./fiemap-perf-test.sh (...) /mnt/sdi/foobar: 327680 extents found fiemap took 3597 milliseconds (metadata not cached) /mnt/sdi/foobar: 327680 extents found fiemap took 2107 milliseconds (metadata cached) After this patch: $ ./fiemap-perf-test.sh (...) /mnt/sdi/foobar: 327680 extents found fiemap took 1646 milliseconds (metadata not cached) /mnt/sdi/foobar: 327680 extents found fiemap took 698 milliseconds (metadata cached) That's about 2.2x faster when no metadata is cached, and about 3x faster when all metadata is cached. On a real filesystem with many other files, data, directories, etc, the b+trees will be 2 or 3 levels higher, therefore this optimization will have a higher impact. Several reports of a slow fiemap show up often, the two Link tags below refer to two recent reports of such slowness. This patch, together with the next ones in the series, is meant to address that. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/21dd32c6-f1f9-f44a-466a-e18fdc6788a7@virtuozzo.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/Ysace25wh5BbLd5f@atmark-techno.com/ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logicOmar Sandoval
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer necessary. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: convert block group bit field to use bit helpersJosef Bacik
We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few of these flags. Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can utilize the bit helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-23btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocationsOmar Sandoval
When testing space_cache v2 on a large set of machines, we encountered a few symptoms: 1. "unable to add free space :-17" (EEXIST) errors. 2. Missing free space info items, sometimes caught with a "missing free space info for X" error. 3. Double-accounted space: ranges that were allocated in the extent tree and also marked as free in the free space tree, ranges that were marked as allocated twice in the extent tree, or ranges that were marked as free twice in the free space tree. If the latter made it onto disk, the next reboot would hit the BUG_ON() in add_new_free_space(). 4. On some hosts with no on-disk corruption or error messages, the in-memory space cache (dumped with drgn) disagreed with the free space tree. All of these symptoms have the same underlying cause: a race between caching the free space for a block group and returning free space to the in-memory space cache for pinned extents causes us to double-add a free range to the space cache. This race exists when free space is cached from the free space tree (space_cache=v2) or the extent tree (nospace_cache, or space_cache=v1 if the cache needs to be regenerated). struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin and struct btrfs_block_group::progress are supposed to protect against this race, but commit d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") subtly broke this by allowing multiple transactions to be unpinning extents at the same time. Specifically, the race is as follows: 1. An extent is deleted from an uncached block group in transaction A. 2. btrfs_commit_transaction() is called for transaction A. 3. btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> __btrfs_free_extent() runs the delayed ref for the deleted extent. 4. __btrfs_free_extent() -> do_free_extent_accounting() -> add_to_free_space_tree() adds the deleted extent back to the free space tree. 5. do_free_extent_accounting() -> btrfs_update_block_group() -> btrfs_cache_block_group() queues up the block group to get cached. block_group->progress is set to block_group->start. 6. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls switch_commit_roots(). It sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to block_group->progress, which is block_group->start because the block group hasn't been cached yet. 7. The caching thread gets to our block group. Since the commit roots were already switched, load_free_space_tree() sees the deleted extent as free and adds it to the space cache. It finishes caching and sets block_group->progress to U64_MAX. 8. btrfs_commit_transaction() advances transaction A to TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED. 9. fsync calls btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B. Since transaction A is already in TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED and the commit is for fsync, it advances. 10. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B calls switch_commit_roots(). This time, the block group has already been cached, so it sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to U64_MAX. 11. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls btrfs_finish_extent_commit(), which calls unpin_extent_range() for the deleted extent. It sees last_byte_to_unpin set to U64_MAX (by transaction B!), so it adds the deleted extent to the space cache again! This explains all of our symptoms above: * If the sequence of events is exactly as described above, when the free space is re-added in step 11, it will fail with EEXIST. * If another thread reallocates the deleted extent in between steps 7 and 11, then step 11 will silently re-add that space to the space cache as free even though it is actually allocated. Then, if that space is allocated *again*, the free space tree will be corrupted (namely, the wrong item will be deleted). * If we don't catch this free space tree corruption, it will continue to get worse as extents are deleted and reallocated. The v1 space_cache is synchronously loaded when an extent is deleted (btrfs_update_block_group() with alloc=0 calls btrfs_cache_block_group() with load_cache_only=1), so it is not normally affected by this bug. However, as noted above, if we fail to load the space cache, we will fall back to caching from the extent tree and may hit this bug. The easiest fix for this race is to also make caching from the free space tree or extent tree synchronous. Josef tested this and found no performance regressions. A few extra changes fall out of this change. Namely, this fix does the following, with step 2 being the crucial fix: 1. Factor btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done() out of btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to allow waiting on a caching_ctl that we already hold a reference to. 2. Change the call in btrfs_cache_block_group() of btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() to btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done(), which makes us wait regardless of the space_cache option. 3. Delete the now unused btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() and space_cache_v1_done(). 4. Change btrfs_cache_block_group()'s `int load_cache_only` parameter to `bool wait` to more accurately describe its new meaning. 5. Change a few callers which had a separate call to btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to use wait = true instead. 6. Make btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() static now that it's not used outside of block-group.c anymore. Fixes: d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-17btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffersJosef Bacik
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 but task is already holding lock: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x41/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600 btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230 btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290 btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0 process_one_work+0x271/0x590 worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0 kthread+0xf0/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x41/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70 do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0 relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0 relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70 replace_path+0x541/0x9f0 merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610 merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260 relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 7 locks held by btrfs/752500: #0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90 #1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40 #2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400 #3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610 #4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0 #5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0 #6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73 check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0 ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80 ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110 btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70 ? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 ? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180 replace_path+0x541/0x9f0 merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610 merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260 relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice. There are two competing things going on here. With relocation we create a snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree. Any extent buffers that get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key. However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree lockdep key set. This creates the lock dependency of reloc tree -> normal tree for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks. However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is merging the reloc root into the original fs root. This involves searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block. We have to search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for the block we need to replace. This creates the dependency of normal tree -> reloc tree which is why lockdep complains. Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root. Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged. This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we maintain the lock order of normal tree -> reloc tree We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW at that point gets set to the reloc tree key. This works correctly because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting the key for the block we're linking into the fs root. With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: zoned: write out partially allocated regionNaohiro Aota
cow_file_range() works in an all-or-nothing way: if it fails to allocate an extent for a part of the given region, it gives up all the region including the successfully allocated parts. On cow_file_range(), run_delalloc_zoned() writes data for the region only when it successfully allocate all the region. This all-or-nothing allocation and write-out are problematic when available space in all the block groups are get tight with the active zone restriction. btrfs_reserve_extent() try hard to utilize the left space in the active block groups and gives up finally and fails with -ENOSPC. However, if we send IOs for the successfully allocated region, we can finish a zone and can continue on the rest of the allocation on a newly allocated block group. This patch implements the partial write-out for run_delalloc_zoned(). With this patch applied, cow_file_range() returns -EAGAIN to tell the caller to do something to progress the further allocation, and tells the successfully allocated region with done_offset. Furthermore, the zoned extent allocator returns -EAGAIN to tell cow_file_range() going back to the caller side. Actually, we still need to wait for an IO to complete to continue the allocation. The next patch implements that part. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc036b0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: zoned: finish least available block group on data bg allocationNaohiro Aota
When we run out of active zones and no sufficient space is left in any block groups, we need to finish one block group to make room to activate a new block group. However, we cannot do this for metadata block groups because we can cause a deadlock by waiting for a running transaction commit. So, do that only for a data block group. Furthermore, the block group to be finished has two requirements. First, the block group must not have reserved bytes left. Having reserved bytes means we have an allocated region but did not yet send bios for it. If that region is allocated by the thread calling btrfs_zone_finish(), it results in a deadlock. Second, the block group to be finished must not be a SYSTEM block group. Finishing a SYSTEM block group easily breaks further chunk allocation by nullifying the SYSTEM free space. In a certain case, we cannot find any zone finish candidate or btrfs_zone_finish() may fail. In that case, we fall back to split the allocation bytes and fill the last spaces left in the block groups. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc036b0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: let can_allocate_chunk return errorNaohiro Aota
For the later patch, convert the return type from bool to int and return errors. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: use named constant for reserved device spaceQu Wenruo
There's a reserved space on each device of size 1MiB that can be used by bootloaders or to avoid accidental overwrite. Use a symbolic constant with the explaining comment instead of hard coding the value and multiple comments. Note: since btrfs-progs v4.1, mkfs.btrfs will reserve the first 1MiB for the primary super block (at offset 64KiB), until then the range could have been used by mistake. Kernel has been always respecting the 1MiB range for writes. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: split discard handling out of btrfs_map_blockChristoph Hellwig
Mapping block for discard doesn't really share any code with the regular block mapping case. Split it out into an entirely separate helper that just returns an array of btrfs_discard_stripe structures and the number of stripes. This removes the need for the length field in the btrfs_io_context structure, so remove tht. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-16Merge tag 'for-5.19-rc7-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs reverts from David Sterba: "Due to a recent report [1] we need to revert the radix tree to xarray conversion patches. There's a problem with sleeping under spinlock, when xa_insert could allocate memory under pressure. We use GFP_NOFS so this is a real problem that we unfortunately did not discover during review. I'm sorry to do such change at rc6 time but the revert is IMO the safer option, there are patches to use mutex instead of the spin locks but that would need more testing. The revert branch has been tested on a few setups, all seem ok. The conversion to xarray will be revisited in the future" Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ [1] * tag 'for-5.19-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: Revert "btrfs: turn delayed_nodes_tree into an XArray" Revert "btrfs: turn name_cache radix tree into XArray in send_ctx" Revert "btrfs: turn fs_info member buffer_radix into XArray" Revert "btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray"
2022-07-15Revert "btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray"David Sterba
This reverts commit 48b36a602a335c184505346b5b37077840660634. Revert the xarray conversion, there's a problem with potential sleep-inside-spinlock [1] when calling xa_insert that triggers GFP_NOFS allocation. The radix tree used the preloading mechanism to avoid sleeping but this is not available in xarray. Conversion from spin lock to mutex is possible but at time of rc6 is riskier than a clean revert. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-26Merge tag 'for-5.19-rc3-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - zoned relocation fixes: - fix critical section end for extent writeback, this could lead to out of order write - prevent writing to previous data relocation block group if space gets low - reflink fixes: - fix race between reflinking and ordered extent completion - proper error handling when block reserve migration fails - add missing inode iversion/mtime/ctime updates on each iteration when replacing extents - fix deadlock when running fsync/fiemap/commit at the same time - fix false-positive KCSAN report regarding pid tracking for read locks and data race - minor documentation update and link to new site * tag 'for-5.19-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: Documentation: update btrfs list of features and link to readthedocs.io btrfs: fix deadlock with fsync+fiemap+transaction commit btrfs: don't set lock_owner when locking extent buffer for reading btrfs: zoned: fix critical section of relocation inode writeback btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to migrate space when replacing extents btrfs: add missing inode updates on each iteration when replacing extents btrfs: fix race between reflinking and ordered extent completion
2022-06-21btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BGNaohiro Aota
After commit 5f0addf7b890 ("btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data relocation"), we observe IO errors on e.g, btrfs/232 like below. [09.0][T4038707] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4038707 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2381 btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs] <snip> [09.9][T4038707] Call Trace: [09.5][T4038707] <TASK> [09.3][T4038707] run_delalloc_nocow+0x7f1/0x11a0 [btrfs] [09.6][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x174/0x320 [btrfs] [09.2][T4038707] ? fallback_to_cow+0x980/0x980 [btrfs] [09.3][T4038707] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x33e/0x3e0 [btrfs] [09.5][T4038707] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x445/0x1320 [btrfs] [09.2][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x320/0x320 [btrfs] [09.4][T4038707] ? lock_downgrade+0x6a0/0x6a0 [09.2][T4038707] ? orc_find.part.0+0x1ed/0x300 [09.5][T4038707] ? __module_address.part.0+0x25/0x300 [09.0][T4038707] writepage_delalloc+0x159/0x310 [btrfs] <snip> [09.4][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] [09.9][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Add. Sense: Unaligned write command [09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 CDB: Write(16) 8a 00 00 00 00 00 02 f3 63 87 00 00 00 2c 00 00 [09.4][ C3] critical target error, dev sde, sector 396041272 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 3 prio class 0 [09.9][ C3] BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/dml_102_2 errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 The IO errors occur when we allocate a regular extent in previous data relocation block group. On zoned btrfs, we use a dedicated block group to relocate a data extent. Thus, we allocate relocating data extents (pre-alloc) only from the dedicated block group and vice versa. Once the free space in the dedicated block group gets tight, a relocating extent may not fit into the block group. In that case, we need to switch the dedicated block group to the next one. Then, the previous one is now freed up for allocating a regular extent. The BG is already not enough to allocate the relocating extent, but there is still room to allocate a smaller extent. Now the problem happens. By allocating a regular extent while nocow IOs for the relocation is still on-going, we will issue WRITE IOs (for relocation) and ZONE APPEND IOs (for the regular writes) at the same time. That mixed IOs confuses the write pointer and arises the unaligned write errors. This commit introduces a new bit 'zoned_data_reloc_ongoing' to the btrfs_block_group. We set this bit before releasing the dedicated block group, and no extent are allocated from a block group having this bit set. This bit is similar to setting block_group->ro, but is different from it by allowing nocow writes to start. Once all the nocow IO for relocation is done (hooked from btrfs_finish_ordered_io), we reset the bit to release the block group for further allocation. Fixes: c2707a255623 ("btrfs: zoned: add a dedicated data relocation block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-24Merge tag 'for-5.19-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "Features: - subpage: - support for PAGE_SIZE > 4K (previously only 64K) - make it work with raid56 - repair super block num_devices automatically if it does not match the number of device items - defrag can convert inline extents to regular extents, up to now inline files were skipped but the setting of mount option max_inline could affect the decision logic - zoned: - minimal accepted zone size is explicitly set to 4MiB - make zone reclaim less aggressive and don't reclaim if there are enough free zones - add per-profile sysfs tunable of the reclaim threshold - allow automatic block group reclaim for non-zoned filesystems, with sysfs tunables - tree-checker: new check, compare extent buffer owner against owner rootid Performance: - avoid blocking on space reservation when doing nowait direct io writes (+7% throughput for reads and writes) - NOCOW write throughput improvement due to refined locking (+3%) - send: reduce pressure to page cache by dropping extent pages right after they're processed Core: - convert all radix trees to xarray - add iterators for b-tree node items - support printk message index - user bulk page allocation for extent buffers - switch to bio_alloc API, use on-stack bios where convenient, other bio cleanups - use rw lock for block groups to favor concurrent reads - simplify workques, don't allocate high priority threads for all normal queues as we need only one - refactor scrub, process chunks based on their constraints and similarity - allocate direct io structures on stack and pass around only pointers, avoids allocation and reduces potential error handling Fixes: - fix count of reserved transaction items for various inode operations - fix deadlock between concurrent dio writes when low on free data space - fix a few cases when zones need to be finished VFS, iomap: - add helper to check if sb write has started (usable for assertions) - new helper iomap_dio_alloc_bio, export iomap_dio_bio_end_io" * tag 'for-5.19-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (173 commits) btrfs: zoned: introduce a minimal zone size 4M and reject mount btrfs: allow defrag to convert inline extents to regular extents btrfs: add "0x" prefix for unsupported optional features btrfs: do not account twice for inode ref when reserving metadata units btrfs: zoned: fix comparison of alloc_offset vs meta_write_pointer btrfs: send: avoid trashing the page cache btrfs: send: keep the current inode open while processing it btrfs: allocate the btrfs_dio_private as part of the iomap dio bio btrfs: move struct btrfs_dio_private to inode.c btrfs: remove the disk_bytenr in struct btrfs_dio_private btrfs: allocate dio_data on stack iomap: add per-iomap_iter private data iomap: allow the file system to provide a bio_set for direct I/O btrfs: add a btrfs_dio_rw wrapper btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group btrfs: zoned: properly finish block group on metadata write btrfs: zoned: finish block group when there are no more allocatable bytes left btrfs: zoned: consolidate zone finish functions btrfs: zoned: introduce btrfs_zoned_bg_is_full btrfs: improve error reporting in lookup_inline_extent_backref ...
2022-05-16btrfs: zoned: introduce btrfs_zoned_bg_is_fullNaohiro Aota
Introduce a wrapper to check if all the space in a block group is allocated or not. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: improve error reporting in lookup_inline_extent_backrefNikolay Borisov
When iterating the backrefs in an extent item if the ptr to the 'current' backref record goes beyond the extent item a warning is generated and -ENOENT is returned. However what's more appropriate to debug such cases would be to return EUCLEAN and also print identifying information about the performed search as well as the current content of the leaf containing the possibly corrupted extent item. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: remove btrfs_delayed_extent_op::is_dataDavid Sterba
The value of btrfs_delayed_extent_op::is_data is always false, we can cascade the change and simplify code that depends on it, removing the structure member eventually. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: sink parameter is_data to btrfs_set_disk_extent_flagsDavid Sterba
The parameter has been added in 2009 in the infamous monster commit 5d4f98a28c7d ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") but not used ever since. We can sink it and allow further simplifications. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArrayGabriel Niebler
… rename it to simply fs_roots and adjust all usages of this object to use the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and understand, as it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us, further simplifying the code. Also do some refactoring, esp. where the API change requires largely rewriting some functions, anyway. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use a read/write lock for protecting the block groups treeFilipe Manana
Currently we use a spin lock to protect the red black tree that we use to track block groups. Most accesses to that tree are actually read only and for large filesystems, with thousands of block groups, it actually has a bad impact on performance, as concurrent read only searches on the tree are serialized. Read only searches on the tree are very frequent and done when: 1) Pinning and unpinning extents, as we need to lookup the respective block group from the tree; 2) Freeing the last reference of a tree block, regardless if we pin the underlying extent or add it back to free space cache/tree; 3) During NOCOW writes, both buffered IO and direct IO, we need to check if the block group that contains an extent is read only or not and to increment the number of NOCOW writers in the block group. For those operations we need to search for the block group in the tree. Similarly, after creating the ordered extent for the NOCOW write, we need to decrement the number of NOCOW writers from the same block group, which requires searching for it in the tree; 4) Decreasing the number of extent reservations in a block group; 5) When allocating extents and freeing reserved extents; 6) Adding and removing free space to the free space tree; 7) When releasing delalloc bytes during ordered extent completion; 8) When relocating a block group; 9) During fitrim, to iterate over the block groups; 10) etc; Write accesses to the tree, to add or remove block groups, are much less frequent as they happen only when allocating a new block group or when deleting a block group. We also use the same spin lock to protect the list of currently caching block groups. Additions to this list are made when we need to cache a block group, because we don't have a free space cache for it (or we have but it's invalid), and removals from this list are done when caching of the block group's free space finishes. These cases are also not very common, but when they happen, they happen only once when the filesystem is mounted. So switch the lock that protects the tree of block groups from a spinning lock to a read/write lock. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use rbtree with leftmost node cached for tracking lowest block groupFilipe Manana
We keep track of the start offset of the block group with the lowest start offset at fs_info->first_logical_byte. This requires explicitly updating that field every time we add, delete or lookup a block group to/from the red black tree at fs_info->block_group_cache_tree. Since the block group with the lowest start address happens to always be the one that is the leftmost node of the tree, we can use a red black tree that caches the left most node. Then when we need the start address of that block group, we can just quickly get the leftmost node in the tree and extract the start offset of that node's block group. This avoids the need to explicitly keep track of that address in the dedicated member fs_info->first_logical_byte, and it also allows the next patch in the series to switch the lock that protects the red black tree from a spin lock to a read/write lock - without this change it would be tricky because block group searches also update fs_info->first_logical_byte. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: remove search start argument from first_logical_byte()Filipe Manana
The search start argument passed to first_logical_byte() is always 0, as we always want to get the logical start address of the block group with the lowest logical start address. So remove it, as not only it is not necessary, it also makes the following patches that change the lock that protects the red black tree of block groups from a spin lock to a read/write lock. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: stop allocating a path when checking if cross reference existsFilipe Manana
At btrfs_cross_ref_exist() we always allocate a path, but we really don't need to because all its callers (only 2) already have an allocated path that is not being used when they call btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). So change btrfs_cross_ref_exist() to take a path as an argument and update both its callers to pass in the unused path they have when they call btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-17block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARDChristoph Hellwig
Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is a data integrity operation vs hint. Fully split the limits and helper infrastructure to make the separation more clear. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd] Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> [nifs2] Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> [f2fs] Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache] Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs] Acked-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-27-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-17block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARDChristoph Hellwig
Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard support, similar to what is done for write zeroes. The only places where needs special attention is the RAID5 driver, which must clear discard support for security reasons by default, even if the default stacking rules would allow for it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd] Acked-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> [s390] Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache] Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs] Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-25-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-06btrfs: zoned: activate block group only for extent allocationNaohiro Aota
In btrfs_make_block_group(), we activate the allocated block group, expecting that the block group is soon used for allocation. However, the chunk allocation from flush_space() context broke the assumption. There can be a large time gap between the chunk allocation time and the extent allocation time from the chunk. Activating the empty block groups pre-allocated from flush_space() context can exhaust the active zone counter of a device. Once we use all the active zone counts for empty pre-allocated block groups, we cannot activate new block group for the other things: metadata, tree-log, or data relocation block group. That failure results in a fake -ENOSPC. This patch introduces CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT to distinguish the chunk allocation from find_free_extent(). Now, the new block group is activated only in that context. Fixes: eb66a010d518 ("btrfs: zoned: activate new block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: factor out do_free_extent_accounting helperJosef Bacik
__btrfs_free_extent() does all of the hard work of updating the extent ref items, and then at the end if we dropped the extent completely it does the cleanup accounting work. We're going to only want to do that work for metadata with extent tree v2, so extract this bit into its own helper. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: remove last_ref from the extent freeing codeJosef Bacik
This is a remnant of the work I did for qgroups a long time ago to only run for a block when we had dropped the last ref. We haven't done that for years, but the code remains. Drop this remnant. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add a alloc_reserved_extent helperJosef Bacik
We duplicate this logic for both data and metadata, at this point we've already done our type specific extent root operations, this is just doing the accounting and removing the space from the free space tree. Extract this common logic out into a helper. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: remove BUG_ON(ret) in alloc_reserved_tree_blockJosef Bacik
Switch this to an ASSERT() and return the error in the normal case. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: zoned: remove redundant initialization of to_addJiapeng Chong
to_add is being initialized to len but this is never read as to_add is overwritten later on. Remove the redundant initialization. Cleans up the following clang-analyzer warning: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2769:8: warning: Value stored to 'to_add' during its initialization is never read [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-02btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are doneJosef Bacik
We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file systems in production. I reproduced this locally by injecting errors into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time. This presented as an error while looking up an extent item WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8 RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000 R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0 __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200 ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0 ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50 ? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220 prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320 relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60 balance_kthread+0x35/0x50 ? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60 kthread+0x16b/0x190 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex. However if we had a pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a state where we have a half deleted snapshot. Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up the snapshot. Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that had a pending drop_progress key. If they do then we know we were in the middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info. Then balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again. If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the cleaner_mutex. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07btrfs: zoned: fix chunk allocation condition for zoned allocatorNaohiro Aota
The ZNS specification defines a limit on the number of "active" zones. That limit impose us to limit the number of block groups which can be used for an allocation at the same time. Not to exceed the limit, we reuse the existing active block groups as much as possible when we can't activate any other zones without sacrificing an already activated block group in commit a85f05e59bc1 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space"). However, the check is wrong in two ways. First, it checks the condition for every raid index (ffe_ctl->index). Even if it reaches the condition and "ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >= ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size" is met, there can be other block groups having enough space to hold ffe_ctl->num_bytes. (Actually, this won't happen in the current zoned code as it only supports SINGLE profile. But, it can happen once it enables other RAID types.) Second, it checks the active zone availability depending on the raid index. The raid index is just an index for space_info->block_groups, so it has nothing to do with chunk allocation. These mistakes are causing a faulty allocation in a certain situation. Consider we are running zoned btrfs on a device whose max_active_zone == 0 (no limit). And, suppose no block group have a room to fit ffe_ctl->num_bytes but some room to meet ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size (i.e. max_extent_size > num_bytes >= min_alloc_size). In this situation, the following occur: - With SINGLE raid_index, it reaches the chunk allocation checking code - The check returns true because we can activate a new zone (no limit) - But, before allocating the chunk, it iterates to the next raid index (RAID5) - Since there are no RAID5 block groups on zoned mode, it again reaches the check code - The check returns false because of btrfs_can_activate_zone()'s "if (raid_index != BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)" part - That results in returning -ENOSPC without allocating a new chunk As a result, we end up hitting -ENOSPC too early. Move the check to the right place in the can_allocate_chunk() hook, and do the active zone check depending on the allocation flag, not on the raid index. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07btrfs: add extent allocator hook to decide to allocate chunk or notNaohiro Aota
Introduce a new hook for an extent allocator policy. With the new hook, a policy can decide to allocate a new block group or not. If not, it will return -ENOSPC, so btrfs_reserve_extent() will cut the allocation size in half and retry the allocation if min_alloc_size is large enough. The hook has a place holder and will be replaced with the real implementation in the next patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07btrfs: zoned: unset dedicated block group on allocation failureNaohiro Aota
Allocating an extent from a block group can fail for various reasons. When an allocation from a dedicated block group (for tree-log or relocation data) fails, we need to unregister it as a dedicated one so that we can allocate a new block group for the dedicated one. However, we are returning early when the block group in case it is read-only, fully used, or not be able to activate the zone. As a result, we keep the non-usable block group as a dedicated one, leading to further allocation failure. With many block groups, the allocator will iterate hopeless loop to find a free extent, results in a hung task. Fix the issue by delaying the return and doing the proper cleanups. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: track the csum, extent, and free space trees in a rb treeJosef Bacik
In the future we are going to have multiple copies of these trees. To facilitate this we need a way to lookup the different roots we are looking for. Handle this by adding a global root rb tree that is indexed on the root->root_key. Then instead of loading the roots at mount time with individually targeted keys, simply search the tree_root for anything with the specific objectid we want. This will make it straightforward to support both old style and new style file systems. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: stop accessing ->csum_root directlyJosef Bacik
We are going to have multiple csum roots in the future, so convert all users of ->csum_root to btrfs_csum_root() and rename ->csum_root to ->_csum_root so we can easily find remaining users in the future. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directlyJosef Bacik
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to _extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up the remaining direct accesses in the future. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: use chunk_root in find_free_extent_update_loopJosef Bacik
We're only using this to start the transaction with to possibly allocate a chunk. It doesn't really matter which root to use, but with extent tree v2 we'll need a bytenr to look up a extent root which makes the usage of the extent_root awkward here. Simply change it to the chunk_root. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: make remove_extent_backref pass the rootJosef Bacik
With extent tree v2 we'll have a different extent root based on where the bytenr is located, so adjust the remove_extent_backref() helper and it's helpers to pass the extent_root around. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: drop the _nr from the item helpersJosef Bacik
Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values, rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr() helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then rename all of the callers to the new helpers. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>