From 98af39d52e336b2d7d7be67ac405f978d81f65b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yixuan Cao Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:16:00 -0700 Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a comment The sentence "but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving" should be rephrased with "but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving" where "mempolicy" is a struct name. This work is coauthored by Yinan Zhang Jiajian Ye Shenghong Han Chongxi Zhao Yuhong Feng Yongqiang Liu Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401064543.4447-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'mm/vmalloc.c') diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index cadfbb5155ea..9d68ac51a19d 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE, * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node, - * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving. + * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving. */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp, -- cgit v1.2.3