| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.
The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)
It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.
Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).
Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When this no-op dram_init_banksize() is removed, the weak default will
be used instead, which correctly sets the bi_dram[] banksize values.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
|
|
Move all assignments to gd->bd->bi_mem{start,size} to generic code in
setup_bdinfo.
Xtensa architecture is special in this regard as it defines its own
handling of gd->bd->bi_mem{start,size} fields. In order to avoid defining
a weak SDRAM function, let arch_setup_bdinfo overwrite the generic flags.
For ARC architecture, remove ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R from Kconfig since it is
not needed anymore.
Also, use gd->ram_base to populate bi_memstart to avoid an ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrokdin@synopsys.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
A number of board function belong in init.h with the others. Move them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move env_set() over to the new header file.
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
We are now using an env_ prefix for environment functions. Rename these
two functions for consistency. Also add function comments in common.h.
Quite a few places use getenv() in a condition context, provoking a
warning from checkpatch. These are fixed up in this patch also.
Suggested-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We are now using an env_ prefix for environment functions. Rename setenv()
for consistency. Also add function comments in common.h.
Suggested-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This header includes things that are needed to make driver build. Adjust
existing users to include that always, even if other dm/ includes are
present
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
By making dram_init_banksize() return an error code we can drop the
wrapper. Adjust this and clean up all implementations.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
|
|
The 'xtfpga' board is actually a set of FPGA evaluation boards that
can be configured to run an Xtensa processor.
- Avnet Xilinx LX60
- Avnet Xilinx LX110
- Avnet Xilinx LX200
- Xilinx ML605
- Xilinx KC705
These boards share the same components (open-ethernet, ns16550 serial,
lcd display, flash, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
