| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since this driver can be used for rk8xx series pmic,
let's rename rk808 to rk8xx, to make it clear.
Configs parts are done by sed -i "s/RK808/RK8XX/g" `grep RK808 -lr ./`
Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@iotwrt.com>
|
|
Those tests check:
- the ability for a phy-user to get a phy based on its name or its index
- the ability of a phy device (provider) to manage multiple ports
- the ability to perform operations on the phy (init,deinit,on,off)
- the behavior of the uclass when optional operations are not implemented
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Rather than using CMD_CRAMFS for both the filesystem and its command, we
should have a separate option for each. This allows us to enable CRAMFS
support without the command, if desired, which reduces U-Boot's size
slightly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: imply FS_CRAMFS for keymile]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This converts the following to Kconfig:
CONFIG_CMD_CRAMFS
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: imply CMD_CRAMFS for keymile]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Rather than using CMD_CBFS for both the filesystem and its command, we
should have a separate option for each. This allows us to enable CBFS
support without the command, if desired, which reduces U-Boot's size
slightly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: imply FS_CBFS on SYS_COREBOOT]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This converts the following to Kconfig:
CONFIG_CMD_CBFS
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: imply CMD_CBFS on SYS_COREBOOT]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This converts the following to Kconfig:
CONFIG_CMD_BMP
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Add depends on LCD || DM_VIDEO || VIDEO]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was
submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/748172/
Add a simple test to get us started.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Allow LEDs to be blinked if the driver supports it. Enable this for
sandbox so that the tests run.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ziping Chen <techping.chan@gmail.com>
|
|
Boards with an apparent need for the md5sum command had the connected
config symbol defined in their board header file.
Move this over to the respective defconfig files now that md5sum is
configured via Kconfig.
(This is a manual effort, which differs from moveconfig.py, not sure
who is right here. Boards except sandbox loose the md5sum command with
moveconfig.py, though it was explicitly mentioned in their config.h's)
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: migrate stih410-b2260]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
[1] Rename CONFIG_SANDBOX_MMC to CONFIG_MMC_SANDBOX for consistency
I want all MMC driver options prefixed with CONFIG_MMC_.
[2] Fix dependency
Add necessary depends on to avoid compile error.
Instead "depends on MMC" is unneeded because this config entry
resides inside of "if MMC".
[3] Currently, this config symbol is not referenced at all.
Use it to enable/disable the driver in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
We convert CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS to Kconfig first. But in order to cleanly
update all of the config files we must also update CMD_PART and CMD_GPT to also
be in Kconfig in order to avoid complex logic elsewhere to update all of the
config files.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay73@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay73@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay73@gmail.com>
|
|
This option should not really be user selectable. Note that on PowerPC
we currently only need BOARD_LATE_INIT when CHAIN_OF_TRUST is enabled so be
conditional on that.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (for UniPhier)
|
|
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
|
|
Commit 7a777f6d6f35 ("mmc: Add generic Kconfig option") created
a Kconfig entry for this option without any actual moves, then
commit 44c798799f66 ("sunxi: Use Kconfig CONFIG_MMC") moved
instances only for SUNXI.
We generally do not like such partial moves. This kind of work
is automated by tools/moveconfig.py, so it is pretty easy to
complete this move.
I am adding "default ARM || PPC || SANDBOX" (suggested by Tom).
This shortens the configs and will ease new board porting.
This commit was created as follows:
[1] Edit Kconfig (remove the "depends on", add the "default",
copy the prompt and help message from Linux)
[2] Run 'tools/moveconfig.py -y -s -r HEAD MMC'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
|
|
A number of platforms had been using the distro default feature before
it was moved to Kconfig but did not enable the new Kconfig option when
it was enabled. This caused a regression in terms of features and this
introduces breakage when more things move to Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Add 'PCI' as a menu option and migrate all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This converts the following to Kconfig:
CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_IS_IN_ENV
CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Re-order, re-migrate]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move these option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
The Power PC boards don't have a suitable common element: the common header
files don't appear to line up with the Kconfig files as far as I can tell.
This results in a lot of defconfig changes.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
[trini: Re-migrate, update common/console.c logic]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 90c08d9e08c7a108ab904f3bbdeb558081757892.
I took a closer look at this after the commit was applied, and found
CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 was too much. 8KB memory for SPL is
actually too big for some boards. Perhaps 0x800 is enough, but the
situation varies board by board.
Let's postpone our decision until we come up with a better idea.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move the SPL settings into common/spl where most of the SPL code is kept.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
If both SPL_DM and SPL_OF_CONTROL are enabled, SPL needs to bind
several devices, but CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x400 is apparently
not enough. Increase the default to 0x2000 for the case. This
will be helpful for shorter defconfigs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Enable this feature so that we can use it for testing in sandbox_spl.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
It is useful to be able to build SPL for sandbox. It provides additional
build coverage and allows SPL features to be tested in sandbox. However
it does not need worthwhile to always create an SPL build. It nearly
doubles the build time and the feature is (so far) seldom used.
So for now, create a separate build target for sandbox SPL. This allows
experimentation with this new feature without impacting existing workflows.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
