From b73dba7a83f2071ef97e175be5ee8a2492042e96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:38:40 -0600 Subject: x86: Tidy up EFI code in interrupt_init() The ll_boot_init() check handles the EFI case so we don't need the rest of the code. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c b/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c index fae2544c456..f3f3527237f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c @@ -266,6 +266,10 @@ int interrupt_init(void) struct udevice *dev; int ret; + /* + * When running as an EFI application we are not in control of + * interrupts and should leave them alone. + */ if (!ll_boot_init()) return 0; @@ -274,11 +278,6 @@ int interrupt_init(void) if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) return ret; - /* - * When running as an EFI application we are not in control of - * interrupts and should leave them alone. - */ -#ifndef CONFIG_EFI_APP /* Just in case... */ disable_interrupts(); @@ -294,14 +293,8 @@ int interrupt_init(void) /* Initialize core interrupt and exception functionality of CPU */ cpu_init_interrupts(); - /* - * It is now safe to enable interrupts. - * - * TODO(sjg@chromium.org): But we don't handle these correctly when - * booted from EFI. - */ + /* It is now safe to enable interrupts */ enable_interrupts(); -#endif return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3