armv8: dts: fsl: Remove cpu nodes from Layerscape DTSIs

Currently layescape SoCs are not using cpu nodes. So removing
them in favour of compatibly with  similar SoCs that
have different cores like LS2080A and LS2088A.

This has been tested on LS2080AQDS, LS1043ARDB, LS1012ARDB.

Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhimanyu Saini <abhimanyu.saini@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>

3 files changed, 0 insertions, 105 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
index 546a87a0a5b..024527e815f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
@@ -9,18 +9,6 @@
 / {
 	compatible = "fsl,ls1012a";
 	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
-	cpus {
-		#address-cells = <2>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
-
-		cpu0: cpu@0 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
-			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
-			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
-		};
-
-	};
 
 	sysclk: sysclk {
 		compatible = "fixed-clock";
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
index bf1dfe6db61..a8bffbafa7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
@@ -15,38 +15,6 @@
 / {
 	compatible = "fsl,ls1043a";
 	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
-	cpus {
-		#address-cells = <2>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
-
-		cpu0: cpu@0 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
-			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
-			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
-		};
-
-		cpu1: cpu@1 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
-			reg = <0x0 0x1>;
-			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
-		};
-
-		cpu2: cpu@2 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
-			reg = <0x0 0x2>;
-			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
-		};
-
-		cpu3: cpu@3 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
-			reg = <0x0 0x3>;
-			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
-		};
-	};
 
 	sysclk: sysclk {
 		compatible = "fixed-clock";
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
index 68ed1338535..b308c8b9822 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
@@ -12,67 +12,6 @@
 	#address-cells = <2>;
 	#size-cells = <2>;
 
-	cpus {
-		#address-cells = <2>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
-
-		/*
-		 * We expect the enable-method for cpu's to be "psci", but this
-		 * is dependent on the SoC FW, which will fill this in.
-		 *
-		 * Currently supported enable-method is psci v0.2
-		 */
-
-		/* We have 4 clusters having 2 Cortex-A57 cores each */
-		cpu@0 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@1 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x1>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@100 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@101 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x101>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@200 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@201 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x201>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@300 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
-		};
-
-		cpu@301 {
-			device_type = "cpu";
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
-			reg = <0x0 0x301>;
-		};
-	};
-
 	memory@80000000 {
 		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>;