diff options
author | Masahiro Yamada | 2017-11-22 02:38:29 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Masahiro Yamada | 2017-11-29 00:28:59 +0900 |
commit | 470c29d1c28d23bdd86456bc431b8f26f8727903 (patch) | |
tree | 63f650dd9f6b9f024127727db7d8409a6f774404 /drivers/mtd | |
parent | 52cde35b9645e60a0c8e4040136476c4f9804110 (diff) |
mtd: nand: add generic helpers to check, match, maximize ECC settings
Driver are responsible for setting up ECC parameters correctly.
Those include:
- Check if ECC parameters specified (usually by DT) are valid
- Meet the chip's ECC requirement
- Maximize ECC strength if NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE flag is set
The logic can be generalized by factoring out common code.
This commit adds 3 helpers to the NAND framework:
nand_check_ecc_caps - Check if preset step_size and strength are valid
nand_match_ecc_req - Match the chip's requirement
nand_maximize_ecc - Maximize the ECC strength
To use the helpers above, a driver needs to provide:
- Data array of supported ECC step size and strength
- A hook that calculates ECC bytes from the combination of
step_size and strength.
By using those helpers, code duplication among drivers will be
reduced.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[Linux commit: 2c8f8afa7f92acb07641bf95b940d384ed1d0294]
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 220 |
1 files changed, 220 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index e490c84e84d..77a3f160e7a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -4077,6 +4077,226 @@ int nand_scan_ident(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_ident); +/** + * nand_check_ecc_caps - check the sanity of preset ECC settings + * @chip: nand chip info structure + * @caps: ECC caps info structure + * @oobavail: OOB size that the ECC engine can use + * + * When ECC step size and strength are already set, check if they are supported + * by the controller and the calculated ECC bytes fit within the chip's OOB. + * On success, the calculated ECC bytes is set. + */ +int nand_check_ecc_caps(struct nand_chip *chip, + const struct nand_ecc_caps *caps, int oobavail) +{ + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); + const struct nand_ecc_step_info *stepinfo; + int preset_step = chip->ecc.size; + int preset_strength = chip->ecc.strength; + int nsteps, ecc_bytes; + int i, j; + + if (WARN_ON(oobavail < 0)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!preset_step || !preset_strength) + return -ENODATA; + + nsteps = mtd->writesize / preset_step; + + for (i = 0; i < caps->nstepinfos; i++) { + stepinfo = &caps->stepinfos[i]; + + if (stepinfo->stepsize != preset_step) + continue; + + for (j = 0; j < stepinfo->nstrengths; j++) { + if (stepinfo->strengths[j] != preset_strength) + continue; + + ecc_bytes = caps->calc_ecc_bytes(preset_step, + preset_strength); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ecc_bytes < 0)) + return ecc_bytes; + + if (ecc_bytes * nsteps > oobavail) { + pr_err("ECC (step, strength) = (%d, %d) does not fit in OOB", + preset_step, preset_strength); + return -ENOSPC; + } + + chip->ecc.bytes = ecc_bytes; + + return 0; + } + } + + pr_err("ECC (step, strength) = (%d, %d) not supported on this controller", + preset_step, preset_strength); + + return -ENOTSUPP; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_check_ecc_caps); + +/** + * nand_match_ecc_req - meet the chip's requirement with least ECC bytes + * @chip: nand chip info structure + * @caps: ECC engine caps info structure + * @oobavail: OOB size that the ECC engine can use + * + * If a chip's ECC requirement is provided, try to meet it with the least + * number of ECC bytes (i.e. with the largest number of OOB-free bytes). + * On success, the chosen ECC settings are set. + */ +int nand_match_ecc_req(struct nand_chip *chip, + const struct nand_ecc_caps *caps, int oobavail) +{ + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); + const struct nand_ecc_step_info *stepinfo; + int req_step = chip->ecc_step_ds; + int req_strength = chip->ecc_strength_ds; + int req_corr, step_size, strength, nsteps, ecc_bytes, ecc_bytes_total; + int best_step, best_strength, best_ecc_bytes; + int best_ecc_bytes_total = INT_MAX; + int i, j; + + if (WARN_ON(oobavail < 0)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* No information provided by the NAND chip */ + if (!req_step || !req_strength) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + /* number of correctable bits the chip requires in a page */ + req_corr = mtd->writesize / req_step * req_strength; + + for (i = 0; i < caps->nstepinfos; i++) { + stepinfo = &caps->stepinfos[i]; + step_size = stepinfo->stepsize; + + for (j = 0; j < stepinfo->nstrengths; j++) { + strength = stepinfo->strengths[j]; + + /* + * If both step size and strength are smaller than the + * chip's requirement, it is not easy to compare the + * resulted reliability. + */ + if (step_size < req_step && strength < req_strength) + continue; + + if (mtd->writesize % step_size) + continue; + + nsteps = mtd->writesize / step_size; + + ecc_bytes = caps->calc_ecc_bytes(step_size, strength); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ecc_bytes < 0)) + continue; + ecc_bytes_total = ecc_bytes * nsteps; + + if (ecc_bytes_total > oobavail || + strength * nsteps < req_corr) + continue; + + /* + * We assume the best is to meet the chip's requrement + * with the least number of ECC bytes. + */ + if (ecc_bytes_total < best_ecc_bytes_total) { + best_ecc_bytes_total = ecc_bytes_total; + best_step = step_size; + best_strength = strength; + best_ecc_bytes = ecc_bytes; + } + } + } + + if (best_ecc_bytes_total == INT_MAX) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + chip->ecc.size = best_step; + chip->ecc.strength = best_strength; + chip->ecc.bytes = best_ecc_bytes; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_match_ecc_req); + +/** + * nand_maximize_ecc - choose the max ECC strength available + * @chip: nand chip info structure + * @caps: ECC engine caps info structure + * @oobavail: OOB size that the ECC engine can use + * + * Choose the max ECC strength that is supported on the controller, and can fit + * within the chip's OOB. On success, the chosen ECC settings are set. + */ +int nand_maximize_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, + const struct nand_ecc_caps *caps, int oobavail) +{ + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); + const struct nand_ecc_step_info *stepinfo; + int step_size, strength, nsteps, ecc_bytes, corr; + int best_corr = 0; + int best_step = 0; + int best_strength, best_ecc_bytes; + int i, j; + + if (WARN_ON(oobavail < 0)) + return -EINVAL; + + for (i = 0; i < caps->nstepinfos; i++) { + stepinfo = &caps->stepinfos[i]; + step_size = stepinfo->stepsize; + + /* If chip->ecc.size is already set, respect it */ + if (chip->ecc.size && step_size != chip->ecc.size) + continue; + + for (j = 0; j < stepinfo->nstrengths; j++) { + strength = stepinfo->strengths[j]; + + if (mtd->writesize % step_size) + continue; + + nsteps = mtd->writesize / step_size; + + ecc_bytes = caps->calc_ecc_bytes(step_size, strength); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ecc_bytes < 0)) + continue; + + if (ecc_bytes * nsteps > oobavail) + continue; + + corr = strength * nsteps; + + /* + * If the number of correctable bits is the same, + * bigger step_size has more reliability. + */ + if (corr > best_corr || + (corr == best_corr && step_size > best_step)) { + best_corr = corr; + best_step = step_size; + best_strength = strength; + best_ecc_bytes = ecc_bytes; + } + } + } + + if (!best_corr) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + chip->ecc.size = best_step; + chip->ecc.strength = best_strength; + chip->ecc.bytes = best_ecc_bytes; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_maximize_ecc); + /* * Check if the chip configuration meet the datasheet requirements. |