treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/eepro100.c b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
index 45ea3b70fca..feba5327da4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/eepro100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ done:
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_DM_ETH
-static int eepro100_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bis)
+static int eepro100_init(struct eth_device *dev, struct bd_info *bis)
 {
 	struct eepro100_priv *priv =
 		container_of(dev, struct eepro100_priv, dev);
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int eepro100_recv(struct eth_device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis)
+int eepro100_initialize(struct bd_info *bis)
 {
 	struct eepro100_priv *priv;
 	struct eth_device *dev;