diff options
author | Stephen Warren | 2016-07-18 17:01:51 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Warren | 2016-07-21 09:31:30 -0700 |
commit | 2a5f7f20747637cd1f94d4accfd7caa99a7c6035 (patch) | |
tree | 713bbf545a37930b51b731d925dfe60df74f1a82 /scripts/Makefile | |
parent | 0e2b5350d9523c9b2dca57b98c89f031691d23e3 (diff) |
ARM: tegra: pick up actual memory size
On Tegra186, U-Boot is booted by the binary firmware as if it were a
Linux kernel. Consequently, a DTB is passed to U-Boot. Cache the address
of that DTB, and parse the /memory/reg property to determine the actual
RAM regions that U-Boot and subsequent EL2/EL1 SW may actually use.
Given the binary FW passes a DTB to U-Boot, I anticipate the suggestion
that U-Boot use that DTB as its control DTB. I don't believe that would
work well, so I do not plan to put any effort into this. By default the
FW-supplied DTB is the L4T kernel's DTB, which uses non-upstreamed DT
bindings. U-Boot aims to use only upstreamed DT bindings, or as close as
it can get. Replacing this DTB with a DTB using upstream bindings is
physically quite easy; simply replace the content of one of the GPT
partitions on the eMMC. However, the binary FW at least partially relies
on the existence/content of some nodes in the DTB, and that requires the
DTB to be written according to downstream bindings. Equally, if U-Boot
continues to use appended DTBs built from its own source tree, as it does
for all other Tegra platforms, development and deployment is much easier.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/Makefile')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions